No wonder netizens will say that one really dares to write this paper and the other really dares to publish it. After all, this kind of paper is completely insulting the IQ of the broad masses of the people. First of all, the saying that boiled eggs are metamorphosed is completely contrary to biology. From a biological point of view, this is irreversible. If we understand it from his point of view, can the deceased possess himself as long as his mind is big enough? If you can achieve this level, it is definitely a reputation, and the Nobel Prize is in hand.
She can't repeat her experiment, but she is bluffing here with an idea. No wonder CCTV will comment that this is an anti-IQ paper and an insult to everyone. In fact, I think that if we want to avoid publishing this kind of paper again, then relevant academic journals should play a regulatory role. After all, papers are published through their own journals, and there may be many absurd papers every year, but if they are all published, the whole academic community will be in chaos.
Academic journals have the responsibility and obligation to kick out some absurd articles, leaving only scientific articles. It is not correct to publish directly as long as someone is reckless, so academic journals also have their own responsibilities. Of course, the main responsibility lies with the author of the paper. After all, academic journals only play a connecting role and are responsible for poor audit management.