How to write the evaluation of the paper? When students finish their papers, they need to instruct their teachers to write some papers for evaluation. Many people don't know how to evaluate students' papers. I collected and sorted out the relevant information on how to write a paper for everyone. Let's have a look.

How to write 1 for the evaluation of the paper?

The evaluation of the paper needs to finish all the papers, and then evaluate the shortcomings of the paper according to some ideas of the author, such as improper topic selection; Incorrect views; There are too many grammatical errors; Plagiarism is serious; The format of the paper does not meet the requirements of the specification; Failing to finish the paper on time, etc. , the specific model essay is as follows:

The title of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language. Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes.

The author tries to find the connection between the author and a character in Jack London's life. From the content point of view, the author has a better understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials, but only limited to the list of materials. How to draw your own conclusion by analyzing the materials is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author's efforts are not enough.

Precautions:

1, the abstract of the paper should exclude the content that has become common sense in this subject field; Never write what should appear in the introduction into the abstract; Generally don't interpret and comment on the content of the paper (especially self-evaluation).

2. Don't simply repeat the information already in the title.

3. Rigorous structure, concise expression and exact semantics. What to write first, then what to write, should be arranged in logical order. Sentences should be coherent and echo each other. Use long sentences with caution and keep them as simple as possible. Every sentence should be clear, and there should be no vague, general or vague words, but the abstract is a complete essay after all, and telegraph writing is not enough. The abstract is not segmented.

How to write the evaluation of the paper? 2. How to write the evaluation opinions of the paper?

1. This paper studies the official accountability system, which can provide reference for solving the problems existing in the official accountability system in China. In the structure of the full text, the practical significance of the official accountability system is analyzed first, and then the official accountability system in China is analyzed.

2. Research on the topic of * * *. It can provide reference for solving the * * *-problem. In the structure of the full text, we should first adjust the basic concepts to ask questions, then analyze the problems in depth, and finally put forward effective suggestions for * *. The full text reflects the requirements of professional characteristics, some of which are closely related to responsibilities, and there are not many contents that really belong to their own innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

3. The title of the full text is * * *. Focus on the problem of * * *, and then put forward effective suggestions for the problem. The structure of the full text meets the requirements, the logical thinking is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the viewpoints are expressed accurately, the language is fluent, and the argumentation method is reasonable. The reference materials are closely combined with the theme.

4. Make an in-depth analysis of the dilemma, and finally put forward effective suggestions to solve the dilemma. The full text reflects the requirements of professional characteristics, meets the training requirements of administrative management specialty, and the references meet the needs of the paper's viewpoints and themes, and the practical demonstration is not enough. But there is not much real innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

5. The paper has clear ideas and fluent sentences. Be able to investigate the existing problems of * * *-well. The author has a certain understanding and familiarity with the content of the paper. Clear thinking, clear hierarchy and reasonable logical structure. The viewpoint is expressed accurately. The research principles are appropriate. In the process of demonstration, we can effectively combine professional principles with the topics to be studied. The opinions demonstrated in some places are not very clear, and generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.

6. This paper studies the official accountability system, which can provide reference for solving the problems existing in the official accountability system in China. In the structure of the full text, firstly, the basic principle of the official accountability system is analyzed, then the problems existing in the official accountability system in China are deeply analyzed, and finally, effective suggestions are put forward for the previous problems. The full text reflects the requirements of professional characteristics, some of which are closely related to responsibilities, and there are not many contents that really belong to their own innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

7. Paper Comments-Excellent: The topic of the paper meets the professional training objectives and can achieve the comprehensive training objectives. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance). The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, and can comprehensively collect information about the examination system. In the process of writing, I can comprehensively apply the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and I have a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge. The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions. The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.

8. The structure of the full text is basically reasonable and scientific, the logical thinking is clear, the viewpoints are expressed accurately, the language is fluent, the argumentation method is reasonable, the references meet the theme requirements, the theme and content meet the professional requirements, and some of them are closely related to this part, but individual quotations are not marked, and there are not many truly innovative contents, and individual concepts are vague, which generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.

9, study * * * as the topic, fully reflect the characteristics of the times. It can provide reference value for solving administrative problems in China. The full text is reasonable in structure, clear in thinking and obvious in viewpoint. What can be taught well in the process of argumentation is to combine argumentation with case argumentation. The disadvantage is that some arguments are not convincing. Thesis review

10, full text titled * * *, novel and practical. The full text has scientific and reasonable structure, strong logic and clear thinking, and the references consulted meet the requirements of the paper. The demonstration method is reasonable. The content of the argument is more convincing. The analysis of the problem is more thorough. In the process of demonstration, students can also combine the principles of administrative professional knowledge with social reality. Whether it is from the topic selection or viewpoint demonstration, it meets the requirements of the training objectives of administrative management specialty. But innovation is not enough.