The physics paper in the east-west analysis of the earth's rotation "the earth is rotating" does not mean "the earth rotates itself" Kant-Laplace's "nebula hypothesis" that the power of the earth's rotation comes from the inside of the earth misleads earth science. The earth will not turn for no reason, it has no power inside! The reason why the earth rotates once every 24 hours is because it revolves around the sun at a speed of more than 654.38+ 10,000 kilometers per hour. On the way, it encounters the lateral thrust of the solar wind, which causes plasma westerly circulation at high altitude, and the westerly wind at high altitude pushes the ground westerly wind and the ocean current flowing eastward, thus pushing the earth to rotate from west to east. 1. The earth is spinning ≠ The earth is spinning on its own. What people call "the rotation of the earth" today is only describing the attitude of the earth itself around the sun. Its position relative to the sun rotates once every 24 hours; Relative to the position of the star, it rotates once every 23 hours and 56 minutes, which is the basis of the current time scalar, the origin of the solar day and sidereal day, and the reason why the earth appears morning, day, dusk and night. The concept of "Earth rotation" reveals the natural phenomenon of "Earth rotation". ? In fact, Philolous, Heritas and others in ancient Greece have long proposed the conjecture of the earth's rotation. In China's book Dead Bodies during the Warring States Period, there has been a saying that "heaven is left and the earth is right", and the confirmation and acceptance of this natural phenomenon was put forward by Copernicus and Heliocentrism in 1543. However, why does the earth rotate? What is the reason for the rotation? Where does the power of rotation come from? Why do you choose the current direction, posture and speed to rotate? These are all unsolved problems in modern science. It doesn't need to repeat the natural phenomenon of "the earth is spinning" that has been proved, but to find out the reasons behind the phenomenon of the earth's rotation, and find out the source of power and its restrictive factors. "Earth's rotation" is already explaining the reason for the earth's rotation. It must be affirmed that the driving force of the earth's rotation lies in itself, inside the earth rather than outside, and lies in its own internal force rather than external force. Denying the "earth rotation" does not mean denying the phenomenon of "earth rotation", but denying that there is a driving force to promote its rotation inside the earth, just as the driving force of water mill rotation is not in the mill. So "Earth rotation" is not equal to "Earth rotation". They are two different concepts. It is a "mistake" to equate the two. For centuries, people seem to be used to attributing the phenomenon of "Earth's rotation" to the earth's own behavior, but they are not more aware of the difference between these two concepts, and they have not questioned the power source of "Earth's rotation" carefully. On the basis of "the rotation of the earth", several generations have boldly opened up the fields of scientific branches, including geomechanics and atmospheric dynamics, and used the angular momentum, inertia and Coriolis effect produced by the rotation of the earth as their own power sources; Astrophysics uses the principle of "Earth's rotation" to explain the motion of other planets and celestial bodies. Philosophers have summed up the general law that "the motive force of the movement of things exists inside things"; Other branches have used this principle to "satisfactorily" explain other natural phenomena. In such an atmosphere, anyone who instigates the cornerstone of "the earth turns on its own" will inevitably touch a series of branches and trigger a chain earthquake, and the scientific community will rise up and crack down. The problem is that these branches of science misled by "false waiting" have reached a very difficult situation. For example, meteorology has always believed that zonal circulation is caused by "the earth's own rotation", but Venus only rotates once in 243 days, but it has a zonal wind greater than the earth. What is the explanation? Geomechanics holds that mountains are formed by the westward sliding of the earth's crust. Because it can't keep up with the rotation speed of the earth itself, Venus hardly rotates. How did the two huge mountain systems and the Grand Canyon on its surface come from? In addition, I will give you an earth and put it in the same orbit in space. Can it spin? Finally, the question of whether the earth rotates has been sharply mentioned in front of modern science and cannot be avoided. Third, the fictional "nebula theory" science has done nothing wrong. The conclusion is inconsistent with the facts because it was misled by Kant-Laplace's nebula theory. Since Copernicus confirmed that the earth is rotating, people began to explore the power of the earth's rotation. Newton's mechanics accurately described the earth's rotation and precession 300 years ago, but Newton did not discuss the power source of the earth's rotation physically, but simply attributed it to God's "first push". 1755, Kant invented a kind of "primitive nebula" in the book "the history of the universe-the structure of the whole universe according to Newton's theory and its mechanical origin". The earth was born in the gravitational contraction of this nebula, so it keeps the rotational inertia generated during the contraction, and then rotates forever according to Newton's law of inertia. The power of "earth rotation" was born when the earth was formed, and the reason why the earth rotates is the earth. ? With Laplace's mathematicization of this imaginary hypothesis, Kant-Laplace's nebula theory was born. "Earth rotation" is recognized as the reason of the phenomenon of "Earth rotation" and has become a powerful weapon to overcome the God-driven theory. Of course, there are Jones-Jefferies collision tide theory, Schmidt's capture theory, Bennett's new catastrophe theory and so on. This paper puts forward different views and derivation on the initial source of the earth's moment of inertia, but it is not different from Kant's view on the force source of the earth's rotation, that is, there has always been some primitive moment of inertia in the earth. The reasoning process of these hypotheses has a common feature, that is, the first premise is fictitious, and there is no evidence of observation and experiment. Science cannot be based on assumptions that cannot be verified by experiments. The Kant-Laplace Nebula hypothesis is unreliable and cannot be used as the basis of scientific argumentation. Besides, the primitive nebula invented by Kant doesn't exist at all. If there were primitive nebulae 5 billion years ago, there would be no starlight 5 billion light years away, because nebulae do not emit light. Now there are starlight, which means there are no nebulae. Similarly, five billion years later, when people there saw the starlight of our sun, they also said that we were once a primitive nebula. Can you believe it? 4. The earth will not turn around for no reason or give you an earth, and put it in the same orbit. Will it turn around? Maybe you think that if you don't give it a moment of inertia in advance, it won't rotate. Then you are wrong. You are repeating the idea of the early space age. ? In the 1960s, the former Soviet Union and the United States launched satellites into space to detect solar radiation, so that the lens was fixed on the sun and rotated around it. Surprisingly, the satellite rolled in space and the lens swayed from side to side, making it impossible to photograph the sun. There is no Kantian gravitational contraction and no given moment of inertia inside the satellite. Why do satellites turn around for no reason? ? Repeated failures have made scientists doubt the traditional concept of space. Besides gravity and magnetism, there must be a third force in space. Otherwise, objects in space, including the earth, will not rotate for no reason.