Ask an expert to answer the morality and law of a marriage1-mental damage compensation may not work. If he pays you alimony regularly every month, it seems that you can't sue him for mental damage compensation. He will have a "reasonable" explanation, explaining why he didn't visit you and so on. Anyway, he paid alimony.
If there is conclusive evidence that your father lived with another woman in the name of husband and wife before divorcing your mother, you can sue him for bigamy. Then he must have broken the law.
Morality and law in professional activities, public life, professional life and marriage and family life are the three major areas of social life. In the previous chapter, everyone learned the basic norms of morality and law in public life. This chapter will continue to study the basic requirements of morality and law in professional life and marriage and family life. Respecting social morality, cultivating noble professional spirit and establishing family virtues in the new era are all important links to establish the socialist concept of honor and disgrace and temper people's excellent moral quality. In order to go to work and build a family in the future, college students need to seriously study professional ethics and legal knowledge in their career, and establish a correct concept of career choice and entrepreneurship; We should correctly understand and treat love, master marriage and family ethics and legal norms, and lay a good foundation for the completion of the important task of getting married and starting a career.
Professional activities are the most common and basic activities in human social life. Professional ethics and laws in professional life are codes of conduct formulated and formed to regulate and restrain the professional activities of employees, which are widely permeated in all aspects of professional life. They not only restrain and guide employees in all walks of life, but also are necessary conditions to ensure the sustained, healthy and orderly development of society. …………………
:jpkc . yr CTI . edu ./2007/sxdd/third . ASP？ Bigclassname = 26 & ampsmall class name = % B5 % E7 % D7 % D3 % BD % CC % B0 % B8 & amp； id=287
How to understand the moral requirements in love and marriage is actually willing to accept the constraints of traditional etiquette. Be kind to each other's relatives and children internally, show great love for each other, and don't sleep with people other than your lover; Give each other enough face.
Since we chose to be together,
focus one's attention on
Don't break the rules.
Moral bottom line
Debate between morality and law in marriage and family life: Moral norms: The sum total of principles and norms that are determined by certain social and economic relations, evaluated by good and evil, and maintained by people's inner beliefs, public opinions and traditional habits, and adjust the relationship between individuals and between individuals and society.
Laws and regulations refer to the laws, administrative regulations, judicial interpretations, local regulations, local regulations, departmental rules and other normative documents in force in People's Republic of China (PRC), as well as the amendments and supplements to these laws and regulations from time to time. Among them, the law has broad and narrow understandings. Broadly speaking, law refers to all normative documents; In a narrow sense, it only refers to the normative documents formulated by the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee. In the dialogue with laws and regulations, law refers to the narrow law. Laws and regulations mainly refer to administrative regulations, local regulations, ethnic autonomy regulations and special economic zone regulations.
Analyze the relationship between morality and law from the perspective of love, marriage and family (at least 500 words) Talk about the relationship between morality and law from the perspective of freedom of marriage.
Marriage should have been the product of free love and the crystallization of love. But in real life? Everyone knows the beauty of love, but when talking about marriage, we often have to consider a lot, such as identity, status, family situation, income situation, and so on. These factors are important, but they really have nothing to do with love. In modern society, both men and women can earn income through labor and provide themselves with material conditions for survival. Unlike feudal society, women depend on men to live, and women have neither social status nor income. This is the progress of the times. It's better to live by yourself than to marry someone who doesn't like it very much, but has good conditions in all aspects. Then you will have more time to work and live a better life, so that you won't sigh in Fortress Besieged. People outside want to come in and people inside want to go out. In fact, if the combination of two people is entirely voluntary, not because of external pressure or to solve livelihood problems, why can't we choose a person who likes each other and work together to create a happy life? One of the basic principles of the marriage law is freedom of marriage, which means that both men and women have the right to decide their own marriage problems according to the law, without being forced or interfered by anyone. However, in real life, due to the tradition of marriage events, parents' orders and matchmakers' words in China, many parents have greatly interfered with their children's love and marriage. Dare not let children fall in love during school, for fear of affecting their studies; I dare not let my children do anything casually after work, for fear of being cheated. So the so-called blind date came into being, and the degree of fire was no less than the songs of the stars. But interestingly, the blind date scene is often dominated by parents, who are in high spirits, while their children are often too lazy to go. How strange is this in a modern society that advocates freedom of marriage and love? However, the existence of this phenomenon is also influenced by profound social roots and moral factors. China's modernization, after all, is only a few decades. The Qing Dynasty, the last feudal dynasty in China, was a very feudal and conservative dynasty, which had strict constraints and norms on women. This may be because Manchu, like other ethnic minorities, regards women as the property and vassal of men. So after they gained the dominant position, they gradually internalized this habit and tradition into a social norm. In fact, the Han nationality in the Central Plains has always been very open-minded and women also have social status. The ancient city of Handan has always had a tradition of respecting women. In the Ming Dynasty, although most of them were arranged by their parents, some childhood friends grew up together, some married freely and even eloped. These are reflected in some vernacular novels in the Ming Dynasty. I have to admit that novels have great advantages in reflecting folk customs, although I seldom read novels.
It seems a little far to say so much. In fact, I have been trying to explain my understanding of the relationship between law and morality. The law advocates freedom of marriage and clearly stipulates freedom of marriage, which can be said to be advanced and instructive, out of respect and protection of civil rights and freedoms, reference and learning from modern advanced western civilization, and affirmation of the positive part of China traditional culture. Therefore, I believe that the law is an affirmation of the positive and healthy moral norms existing in society, and it is also the backbone of guiding moral development. Morality is a necessary supplement to law. Many problems can be classified into the category of morality, but which should be affirmed and which should be abandoned, and there should be clear choices and judgments when making laws.
Talking about ethics and personal values in love and marriage is to enhance feelings. Dating more * * * has memories. Quarrel is to get to know each other better and learn to make up. Commitment is to prove that this relationship can stand the test. Cherish it because you are afraid of losing it, so take care of it and take it as an adventure. I miss you because I always have you in my heart. I care about my heart, because I love it very much, and my heart runs with my beloved.
Moral and Legal Analysis of "Lin Haosen" Incident; Any criminal has deep-rooted criminal roots and psychology, and so does Lin Senhao. Many people in the society don't understand this case and think that Lin's behavior from poisoning to self-defense is strange and difficult to explain, which leads to various doubts. I will briefly discuss Lin's behavior and judicial results from the perspective of justice.
There are three doubts in the trial of this case. First of all, the amount of poison: whether the amount of poison is 75ml as Lu Weiwei said, 50ml of the experimental results, or 20-30 ml in the confession of forest criminals; The second motive: whether joking or trying to poison Huang Yang; Third, why did a new statement suddenly appear in the interview? I am very angry with another person because he interferes with my sleep. Just when Huang Yang wanted to play a joke, he caught Huang Yang.
Surprisingly, these three doubts are closely related to sentencing. Why are there arguments on these issues alone and harmony on other issues? Before figuring out these three problems, let's take a look at the mental appraisal of forest criminals. There is a saying that "Lin Senhao, the appraised person, is not mentally abnormal at present, and can cooperate with the trial of the case and has the ability of self-protection". What is the ability of self-protection? Why mention the ability of self-protection? Let's make it clear first that a criminal suspect with normal mind will more or less defend himself on some issues when confessing his criminal behavior, such as motivation, the fault of the other party for killing, the amount of robbery and the amount of corruption. This is a kind of self-protection behavior, and it is also a person's most basic instinct. We compared the suspect's self-report with the investigation results. If the self-report of the suspect is light or basically consistent with the investigation results, it can be considered that the self-protection ability of the suspect exists. A criminal suspect can have his own statement, but in most cases, the court will not recognize the statement of the criminal suspect, and of course, it will not fully recognize the statement of the victim, and will speculate according to the criminal investigation experiment (of course, this result is not necessarily the most accurate). It is precisely because of this self-protection ability or desire for survival that these three doubts exist.
When in doubt, there are three conclusions, one is the witness testimony irrelevant to the interests of the case, the other is the investigation conclusion of the public security organ, and the third is the self-report of the criminal suspect. Which one is reliable? First of all, the criminal suspect's self-report is definitely unreliable, because he will definitely have this desire to protect himself. The largest amount of poison, the greater his crime, the heavier his sentence and the greater his loss. So it is understandable that the suspect will definitely talk less. Witness Dr. Lv Weiwei found a job abroad after graduation, and he has no interest in this case. Her testimony is more reliable. She said that there were two airtight lids for storing poison, and then she put on a plastic bag. Because this is a highly toxic chemical, it must be stored in the air, so we can think that the chemicals in this bottle have basically not volatilized. The conclusion of public security investigation will be influenced by the suspect to varying degrees, because this experiment needs the cooperation of the criminal suspect, so it will be less than the real situation to some extent. To sum up, the dose of 60-70ml is more objective.
Doubt 2 has two versions: joking, killing or seriously injuring Huang Yang. First of all, because the suspect's self-protection ability plays a role, he will definitely make the relationship between the two close, thus hiding his criminal motive and fighting for leniency for him, because without criminal motive, there is no premeditated, and without premeditated, there is no intentional homicide, which everyone can think of. We won't and can't judge such cases simply from confessions, and we will definitely make a comprehensive evaluation according to the behavior before and after. First of all, a master student with normal mind can't joke with his roommate with a highly toxic chemical; Second, even for fun, if the consequences are serious, the source of the poison will be pointed out on the spot (note: in the poisoning case of Peking University, the suspect immediately went to the hospital behind the victim's back and directly admitted to poisoning, and asked the hospital to use detoxification drugs for targeted treatment); Third, even if you want to avoid taking legal responsibility, you can secretly inform the doctor in various ways and carry out targeted treatment. We can infer from the results, from Huang Yang's discomfort to his death. Lin Senhao watched Huang Yang's condition get worse day by day, but did nothing to save Huang Yang's life. Just kidding, can you believe it?
Doubt 3: Why is the contradiction between Lin and another person highlighted and angered? This has never appeared in the motives given by the police and the procuratorate in the past. During the investigation in the first instance, he also had the opportunity to answer his own motives. He never mentioned why he suddenly said this motive in an interview with a TV station. Similarly, it also shows that Lin is eager to protect himself. Lin made a joke at first, saying that he had concealed his real motives. From being investigated by the police to the judgment of the first instance, he has always believed in this idea-because there is no motive and no resentment, I have no reason to intentionally kill people. But when he learned of the first-instance judgment (he may have felt it in the detention center, because the treatment of prisoners on death row in the detention center is different from that of other prisoners), he felt that this hope was dashed. But he still has a strong desire to survive, so he found another excuse-a third party affected his mood. How ridiculous and sad this statement is. If trivial things affect you, how can you kill an innocent third party?
Let's review the whole process from the beginning to the end of the crime and the judicial consequences of his actions. The whole behavior process is divided into three stages: poisoning, repentance and trial. The first stage: after forest criminals hold a grudge against Huang Yang and/or a third person for some reason and commit poisoning, which has caused serious consequences, they begin to consult various materials in an attempt to cover up their despicable behavior until they are questioned by the police and do not tell the truth. At this stage, forest criminals took poisoning behavior for some reason, resulting in the death of the victim Huang Yang, and took various methods to cover up the facts and refused to admit it. At this time, all the actions taken by forest criminals can be summarized as follows: covering up the facts to escape the punishment of the law. Results: The motives were despicable, the means were cruel, and the social harm was great. The second stage: from being summoned by the police to the end of the first-instance judgment, from being summoned to taking key evidence from the laptop, forest criminals began to realize that their actions could not be covered up. He adopted the second strategy, which can be summarized as: voluntarily admitting the criminal process, confessing the process, and avoiding the important issues while neglecting the important ones. Doubts 1 and 2 fully illustrate this point. Results: The guilty attitude was good, but he was sentenced to death, because Lin had been unwilling to cut open the dark side of his heart, and it was difficult for the court to expect him to repent. The third stage: forest criminals found a new reason: the third person affected the mood. At this stage, Lin realized that jokes were not adopted. In order to save his life, he had to find a new way to defend his mistakes, so he found a new excuse, which can be summarized as follows: avoiding the truth and being empty, and scheming frequently. Results: It was difficult to identify from legal theory and reason, but it exposed the idea of poisoning the third party.
Morality and law have what must be done, what is forbidden and what is free. The first two are obligations. Finally, on the right. Judging from what must be done, life seems to be on the social stage. Everyone is sincerely performing and putting on a play according to their inner beliefs and morals. For yourself and others, everyone is both an audience and an actor. Individuals and others are the relationship between serving and being served, which embodies the need for cooperation between people. A good director is like a good manager. The standards he commands are like the law, okay. From forbidden things, life is like being on the court. People compete as players in the game because of contradictions. Individuals and opponents are antagonistic and antagonistic, and there is only one winner. At this time, the manager was replaced by a referee. The standards he manages are like the law. He will punish players or teams by warning, yellow card, red card, deduction and expulsion to safeguard justice. However, if the player has a good inner morality and doesn't do anything that infringes on his opponent (in reality, he doesn't confront others or participate in confrontation with others) and quits the game, if the players are like this, and no one plays the game confrontation, it is estimated that the referee will lose his job, and there is no need to use any standards to punish anyone. Therefore, in reality, if a person chooses to be honest and clean, it is morally important to be kind to others.