The meaning of the title, but in terms of meaning, refers to the meaning contained. For example, the people's education version of the text "Dad's Flowers Fall", students should have learned. The teacher once emphasized that the topic contains two meanings: one is that dad's flowers have withered, and the other is that dad's life is over.
It's called a pun, right? Take a closer look, isn't that what it means? Don't you just answer the meaning? Actually, this is just an example. If we really want to be sure, we should make a concrete summary. To put it bluntly, the meaning of such questions includes the functions I mentioned above, and the fact that this article is written around the topic (for example, the topic is life). To sum up carefully, is it similar to the functional answer to the question? Both are very close!
The appreciation of sentences is actually very simple. I'll tell you a rule. If you carefully read those beautiful paragraphs or sentences that are appreciated by others, which one does not use rhetorical devices such as metaphor, personification or parallelism? It can be boldly asserted that what is not used in rhetoric will never be beautiful or appreciated! It is the same whether it is written by a great writer, a writer or an unknown person. You just need to answer "This article uses ... and vividly shows ...".
The role of sentences, the answers are mostly summed up as connecting the preceding with the following, highlighting the center, expressing the author's feelings, summarizing the full text, contrasting the protagonist's psychology, praising someone's spiritual quality and so on. If you can read it, the sentence describing the environment will never be as simple as writing about the scenery. They are only superficial and usually have deep meanings. One is to contrast the author's (or master's) mood, and the other is to express the situation or social deviation at that time. Have you ever read Lu Xun's books or text excerpts? Many of them describe the scenery to set off the mood of the host. Off topic ... you should also pay attention to it, because when Lu Xun writes novels, even his own experience can be called by the name of the host or the person mentioned in the article, not the author or Lu Xun. ...
Meaning, same as above. The same meaning
The expression effect, my god, is the same. ..
The function of adding words. It is to highlight (or embody) something, express someone's feelings or wishes, and so on. For example, for example, the first volume of grade eight, a text "The Language of Nature", "Phenology is a science related to high agricultural yield. We must further strengthen phenological observation, understand the language of nature, and strive for greater gains in agriculture. " If you add the word "Yao", it means that "Yao" is to raise hope and express the author's wishes. "
Same meaning as above. So is the expression effect.
The difference between interpolation and flashback lies in: interpolation is only a fragment in the sequence, not a part of the central event of the full text; The content of flashback is an indispensable part or link in the whole event.
For example, there are two episodes in Lu Xun's Hometown. One is that when my mother was talking about leap soil, the author used "At this time, a miraculous picture suddenly flashed in my mind." It leads to the interpolation of the image of young leap soil. The other is the memory of Yang Er's sister-in-law. These two episodes make the different images and different life situations of Runtu and his sister-in-law Yang Er in sharp contrast, enrich the content of the article, and discuss the theme in depth. The narrative content should be able to supplement, explain or set off the central content, which can be long or short according to the needs of the central content, but it can't go beyond the scope of expressing the central idea, otherwise it will distract attention and appear cumbersome. When using interpolation, we should arrange the connection with the central content, so as to make the transition natural and the content coherent.
Speaking of function is the expression of an article. Generally speaking, if you don't ask about the function, you can't talk about it. There is nothing to talk about in chronological articles. Writing articles in chronological order is the most common.
The comprehension and expressive effect of sentences ... I asked, didn't I? ...
First of all, the function of metaphor is to express the characteristics or appearance of an object through metaphor.
Make the ontology more prominent, clear and vivid. Dull and vivid; Turn abstruse into simple; Turn abstract into concrete; Turn verbosity into conciseness.
Personification and bright colors; Depicting the image; Rich in meaning.
Metonymy, simplification and complexity; Replace the virtual with the real; Replace ordinary with odd numbers; Exchange things for feelings.
Exaggerate, reveal the essence and inspire people; Set off the atmosphere and enhance the appeal; Enhance association; Create an atmosphere.
Parallel, concentrated in content and enhanced in momentum; The narrative is thorough and detailed; The rhythm is distinct and longer than lyricism.
The purpose of asking questions is to attract attention and inspire thinking.
I have probably written all the commonly used ones.
The last question about intention is actually the meaning of function. There are structural arrangements, etc. , or what is the clue to set off what shows what, or what emotions are reflected (from the perspective of structure).
Ah ... time is running out, so I have to log off. I'll add it next time.