Heinz's tragedy is also the tragedy of our society. It is hard for us to imagine how Heinz's weak and seriously ill wife survived after his arrest and imprisonment. An iron window closes not only the outside world, but also the last hope and even life of a young woman. When our laws create such a tragedy, should we reflect on ourselves? Reflecting on our society? Reflect on everything that caused this tragedy?
In social law, it seems to be an eternal proposition that the law cannot tolerate feelings. Law is a set of operating mechanism to safeguard society and ensure the interests of the majority, and there is no room for connivance or acquiescence. Heinz can understand, but he still made a big mistake. Punishing him seems understandable. The essence of the police station is a violent organ, which has the function of punishing all criminal acts. This punishment is clearly written in the cold law. However, after all, we are all living individuals. After all, human nature cannot be bound by ruthless rules, and our life cannot be run by cold legal provisions. Otherwise, people's feelings will only be distorted under the pressure, and our society will only become Jean Valjean described by Hugo. Jean was sentenced by a judge to 19 years of hard labor. He was so full that hungry children were allowed to steal bread.
When the law has drawbacks and defects, it needs to be safeguarded with care. Today, when the self-help ability is insufficient, and his rescue conditions are unrealistic, it is hard to say that there will be no more Heinz who stole medicine to save his wife, and there will be no more Liao Dan who carved his official seal because of heavy medical expenses. These situations are the inevitable consequences of the defects and ineffective operation of social mechanisms. Those who are weak in life, those who are forced by life and have no choice but to put all their eggs in one basket, cannot be solved by strict laws alone. The poet Xin Posca once said: "Human nature is an innate accessory and a valuable thing that is easy to lose." Obviously, our current law can only guarantee your so-called valuables, but kindness is beyond our control, and it is rare now. It can be seen that the law is not omnipotent, and it seems that there must be a side dish of "love" next to the main course of the law.
It is time to face the "illegality" that threatens the social situation. The enforcement of the law cannot be mixed with a trace of personal feelings, but the defects of the law need to be maintained by feelings. Love and law are not incompatible antonyms, but complement each other. Only in this way can more Heinz not be entangled in love and law, and can there be fewer sighing tragedies around him.