Some people read a lot of books and think they are very literate, but they are not. Whether primary school students or postdoctoral students, the difference between them is only the amount of knowledge reserves. As for whether they have culture or not, it depends on their own cultivation.

2. Culture is not how gentle the appearance is.

Culture is not like wearing a pair of glasses. Whether a person has a culture depends not on his appearance, but on his heart. Gentle appearance and vulgar heart are not called culture.

3, the real culture, including these four contents:

(1) Cultivation rooted in the heart

That is to say, a person has self-cultivation, and self-cultivation should take root in his heart and be deeply rooted, and will not change because of changes in the environment. This is called self-cultivation rooted in his heart.

(2) Conscious without reminding

Understanding, spontaneous, no need to remind. For example, it is the least courtesy to give up your seat when you see an old man coming on the subway. This is a manifestation of culture.

(3) Freedom on the premise of constraint

When it comes to freedom, many people only care about themselves and ignore others. For example, the men and women who dominate the high-speed rail harm others for their own freedom. This is the ugly face with no culture.

(4) Goodwill towards others.

It is commendable to help others, think of others and be kind to others, which is the concrete embodiment of culture.

In short, culture is a kind of cultivation, which can be seen, touched, known and felt. Educated people are likable and comfortable to get along with.

Primary school is the beginning of writing. Some people have never been to school or been written. When you express things and your inner thoughts in words, you are easy to get angry and swear, especially when you have an argument with others.

Cultivation does not represent culture. Self-cultivation means continuous learning, continuous improvement, continuous support and continuous revision.

Everyone's education and cultural level are different. The main attack direction is also different. Maybe he's focused on projects that others don't know about. Interlaced like a mountain, so others can't understand his major.

Different cultures pay attention to different majors, and mastering them in some fields means a certain degree of education. Literacy is not a comprehensive grasp of all aspects of knowledge, and it is not necessarily proficient in every line. If you have a culture in this field, you may not have a culture in other majors. Just like a doctor who treats people, he is literate, but he can't do anything about machines. In the same way, a mechanic can't treat people as people when he sees a machine, because the professional things are different and the learning direction is different.

They also have this phenomenon when they exchange papers with each other, and no one can understand anyone. If they talk about pathology and machinery with each other, neither of them can understand what anyone is saying, because their minds have never been written by each other's expertise, and they are all literate. Who can say that he has no culture? It's just that they are not familiar with what the text message expresses. On the one hand, it is literal, on the other hand, it is not literal.

Culture is a combination of changes in the application of words. Words are like photos, and culture is a video that combines one photo with another. The merged article is a movie story. This is culture.

A good culture can clearly express what it wants to describe and convey clear information. Let people know at a glance. Some people are at a loss about the culture itself and don't pretend to understand it, but they have to ramble about something irrelevant to piece it together, which makes people confused. This is a bad culture.

But this is not the only definition of culture.

Philosophers, sociologists, anthropologists, historians, logicians and linguists have given different definitions of "culture" from different angles at different times. Culture: An Evaluation of a Concept Definition was written by kroeber and Crockhorn, famous American cultural experts. This book contains the definition of "culture", with as many as 166 articles.

People can't help asking why there are so many definitions of "culture". Isn't there an accepted and unified definition of "culture"?

No, we can't give a universally accepted and unified definition of "culture".

This is because the concept is the reflection of objective things. The objective thing is a whole composed of more than two parts, which has integrity. The same is true of the concept, which is also a whole composed of more than two parts and also has integrity. "Culture" is such a concept, it is also a whole composed of more than two parts, and it also has integrity.

For example, there is a monument, which is a whole composed of A, B, C and D. ... If several people observe this monument at the same time, they observe the same monument, but in different directions and angles. A observes A, B observes B, C observes C and D, because they observe different parts of the monument, that is, different areas of things, so their descriptions or conclusions about the monument may be different.