Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Reference principles of nursing papers
Reference principles of nursing papers
Reference principles of nursing papers

The quality of references can be evaluated from timeliness, authority, language type and carrier type. The following are the reference principles for nursing papers. Welcome to read!

1. Do not copy.

There may be different definitions of plagiarism at home and abroad. The education I received in China is that I can copy and remember. However, in foreign countries, this is also plagiarism. I prefer foreign definitions. So, the way to quote another article is:

(1) You need to summarize your opinions again, describe them in your own words and in the language suitable for your article, and make comments.

(2) For numbers, use them accurately (data environment, conditions, etc. ), indicate the source and comment.

(3) For some classic words, if you need to quote the original text, you need to enclose the original text in double quotation marks in the article, indicating that you are quoting the original text. And indicate the source.

Personally, I think this is correct. Articles should have their own viewpoints and positions, and the viewpoints and positions of each paper should be different. Therefore, directly copying the original texts of other papers is actually a sloppy attitude towards the papers, without in-depth consideration of the location of the cited papers and the context of their own papers.

2. Reference source

I study engineering myself, and I believe that science has the same standards, and liberal arts are actually similar. There are several biased principles.

(1) Professional papers should try to cite professional sources, not non-professional sources.

The priority of professional sources is roughly as follows:

A well-known groundbreaking paper > a paper from an influential journal >; Influential conference papers > academic works > general journal papers > conference papers > protocols/manuals/databases > classic textbooks > general guidance books > popular journals > newspapers > business journals > websites > personal blogs.

In fact, from the beginning of textbooks, you should not appear in academic articles. Of course, this order will be different for different majors, but it is basically the same. Some people think why it is not good to apply textbooks. If we think that academic papers should be the forefront of academic research, then textbooks are often recognized and have been studied for decades, so it is not important to quote textbooks.

(2) Find a reference source, and find a first-class source.

What is a primary source? In fact, it is the root cause, the first paper to publish this view. This paper may be cited by other papers, so the cited paper is a second-level paper.

When quoting, you must quote the first-class supply. There is a simple reason. Only the first-hand information is the truest expression of this opinion, and other second-hand information may be mixed with the positions and opinions of other authors. Only by finding the first-class source can we show that the author has a deep study on this issue; Only by quoting a first-class source can we show that the author really pays tribute to the cited person (we don't want our views to be counted on others).

In order to do this, we must read all the cited documents, make sure that they are first-class sources, and don't quote quotations from other papers at will (few people really do it, and it is getting worse). In addition, don't think that citing the second-level literature of celebrities can replace the first-level source. Although celebrities have great influence, this is not his original view, and others will see it clearly. Don't think the original is too old to look it up, and don't be lazy.

(3) Selection of citation sources

Sometimes, they are all first-class sources, but you can still choose. For example, there are books, papers, websites, databases, reviews and so on. In my opinion, if there is a paper, it will be cited, and the paper is often the most original. If you have research papers, don't use comments, which are often the second source. If you have a paper, you don't need a book unless there are great changes in the book. Don't think about papers and books, websites and databases.

In addition, the version is also a problem. For example, the version of the book, the version of the agreement, the version of the law and the version of the manual. Probably, we should choose something relatively new, acceptable and available.

Availability also needs to be considered. Sometimes it's really frustrating. Read a paper and find an interesting point of view. As a result, what you see is an invitation report of a meeting, or an internal report, a meeting without publications. These sources may be first-class sources, but no one can get them except the author. The purpose of quoting notes is for readers' reference. If others can't find it at all, the source is meaningless

3. The order of citation sources

Refer to the more acceptable sorting methods at home and abroad.

Sort by order of appearance: the first citation in the article lists the source first. Now the general chinese magazine should follow this standard.

In alphabetical order by author. This method generally appears in English books and graduation thesis.

In chronological order: generally appear in books, comprehensive papers and humanities and social science papers.

It is suggested that all papers should be sorted in the order of appearance, which is the most acceptable, and the methods in Chinese and English are the same. But in fact, the practice of domestic students is often chaotic, and often the papers are not -[ 1] Note. Look at the list of comments out of order. This can only say that the basic writing principles of the paper are not understood.

4. How to write the source code

General magazines will give their own typesetting methods and order, without explanation. Read and modify carefully before submitting. What I want to say is the content. The source is to facilitate readers to find the original text, so everything is based on this principle. For example, if you publish a paper at an academic conference without publications, it is best to mark the address of the electronic version, as is the internal research report. The database and manual used should also be marked with version, year and website for easy searching. Books should be numbered. You don't want the reader to read the whole book, do you?

5. How to prepare

Before writing a paper, you must start to consider references. Don't finish your paper, but add references to show off. I've seen too many such examples, and the result is that there is something wrong with the quotation. For example, some references are from a few sources and people in recent years, and the position of comments is marked in the introduction chapter, and the comments are all popular opinions that can no longer be popular. This will be laughed at.

Before writing a paper, prepare the references that will be used, or even write them directly (like me), which will help to conceive the structure of the paper, so the references behind will naturally not have to be pieced together. Then, when writing a paper, productivity can properly find the source citation when needed. Still the same, rigorous and not lazy.

;