With a magnifying glass, you can see the moon rock samples donated by the United States to China. Only 0.5 g, now in Beijing Planetarium. Brzezinski, US President Carter's special envoy and national security assistant, visited China in 1978 and presented China with 1 g moon rock specimen (only the size of soybean) as a "national gift" ... After the Americans left, China decided to find this 65438. At present, Academician Ouyang Ziyuan, the chief scientist of China's lunar exploration project, has undertaken the research task. Because it is too precious, Professor Ouyang Ziyuan can only take 0.5g for research. With this 0.5g specimen, China published 14 papers!

So this time, "Chang 'e V" will bring back 2 kilograms of specimens. Should we give them to America and Russia?

In fact, we shouldn't be generous! Because the United States and the Soviet Union brought back more samples from the moon than we did, Apollo brought back 38 1.7 kg of lunar rock samples. It's been 50 years, and there are still more than 200 kilograms, which have never been studied at all. Moreover, there are more than 20 kilograms of unmanned spacecraft landing on the moon in the Soviet Union ... more than us, so we can't be generous.

And we in China pay attention to "coming without being indecent". The United States gave us 1 gram, and we can return 2 grams. It's that simple.

We should dedicate the moon rock specimen to his old man. Without the forward-looking strategic decision of their generation to develop "two bombs and one satellite", how could there be the current "Chang 'e V" landing on the moon?

That is, in the future, our moon rock specimens are rich, so it is better to comfort the leaders and give them to those who are afraid of prestige and injustice! It should be exhibited in the national museum for the people of the whole country to watch. This is the best patriotism education!

The soil brought back by the moon can be shared with Russia conditionally, so forget it in the United States!

Some people may say that it is not indecent. Since the United States gave us the moon soil in those years, it is also a beautiful talk to give it back to us this time. However, I do not agree with this statement. Why?

The amount of soil brought back by China is more valuable for research: when the United States landed on the moon, it shared a little soil with us, but it was not only China that shared that soil at that time, but many countries around the world got it, and the corresponding samples were scattered all over the world. The reasons for this state are that the United States obtained a lot of soil at that time, and the soil on the surface of the moon was easier to obtain.

However, the soil brought back by China this time is completely different from that brought back by Americans on the moon. Belonging to deep soil, it has high research value and may be of great help to our science and technology industry. In the current international situation, I don't think it is appropriate to share this high-value content that potentially promotes technological development. Secondly, the quantity we brought back is not much, only about 2 kilograms, which is enough for our own country to do research. If we have to share, we should exchange interests and see what the other party can give us.

The United States refused to cooperate with China in space technology: many people only saw the little moon soil that the United States gave us in the past, but never saw the suppression and obstruction of the United States in space technology. At present, China's space technology and space technology are largely forced out by the United States.

For example, Beidou satellite directly shut down the GPS navigation of some of our equipment in some incidents, and the navigation satellite that wanted to cooperate with the United States and Europe was also rejected. They only allow us to contribute, but we can't get technology.

Another example is space technology. Earlier, we hoped to participate in the corresponding international cooperation and development, but European and American countries directly adopted discriminatory policies, refused to participate in the corresponding technological development in China, and were not allowed to participate in international cooperation.

Because of this, we later had to embark on a difficult road of self-research. The hardships here are by no means what ordinary people can see. Today's achievements are achieved by astronauts at great cost. Why should we share them with America now? Now NASA has the cheek to ask for data sharing, which is shameless. This is very American!

This is not to say that science has no national boundaries and narrow nationalism is not desirable.

Lscssh science officer's point of view: Generally speaking, the soil we got on the moon does not need to be shared with other countries at all, and countries like the United States have no face and are not qualified to come to us. As for Russia, we can share some data in the form of interest exchange according to the principle of reciprocity, without giving it directly or sharing it for free.

Finally, I just want to say that science may have no national boundaries, but technology certainly has national boundaries, and so do scientists! Is it enough to look at the list of enterprises on the American entity list to illustrate these problems? Therefore, don't say that not giving people the moon soil is narrow nationalism. People who say such things are either pure or bad.