Of course, how to integrate theory with practice and achieve logical consistency requires learning more about other people's papers on the Internet and searching for the topic you want to write on the Internet. If your method and experience have been preempted by others, you may have to change your narrative strategy, or look for new innovations further, or optimize others' practices. This is a process of accumulation and cannot be formed at one time.
Since we want to change to research type, we need real research, and we can't make it up on the basis of theoretical derivation. There are many directions to study. It's best to use local materials according to your personal interests and your work priorities. Be a serious and responsible person at work, and often record a little feeling and thinking. After a certain period of time, we will find that there is a lot to say, and the papers written at that time must be fresh and unique.
I hope it helps you.
Teachers write papers mainly to promote teachers to study theory, practice, reflect and grow! Therefore, there is definitely nothing wrong with writing a paper around these four points.
Theoretical study Theoretical study is the basis for every teacher to improve himself. Someone asked the teacher why he created the task of continuing education. Continuing education is to promote teachers' continuous learning and thinking and not to let their thoughts fall behind. At the same time, it is also for teachers to constantly review scientific theories, gradually internalize knowledge, and then present it in practice.
When writing a thesis, theoretical knowledge is the guiding ideology of all practice, but at the same time, new theories can be established through practice. Only in this way can we promote the continuous progress and development of mankind and society.
Therefore, the first step in writing a thesis is to determine what theory you want to elaborate and follow. Theory is the skeleton of a paper!
Practice is the main thread for teachers to write papers. Without practical experience, there is no flesh and blood in the paper. Just like I am answering this question now. Because I often write papers, I have also instructed teachers to write papers and do research, so I have something to say and there are ways to answer it for you.
Therefore, the content of the paper must come from practice. There is a good saying, "If you know why, you should know why." Learning theoretical knowledge is the process of knowing why, and practice is the process of knowing why. After practice, when writing a paper, it will make you talk a lot and stop worrying about the number of words.
Reflection is the meaning and soul of teachers' writing papers.
A paper, what others want to see is not what you did, but what the result is. In fact, not only papers, but also people watch the news and the results, and emotional stories also want to see the results, especially after the play. Therefore, a paper must have its own reflection. According to theoretical cognition and practical exploration, what do you think? Whether it overturns the original theory or confirms its importance, or establishes a new theory through practice. What kind of modification or further study should be made for the future work.
Finally, the content of growth can be integrated with reflection or described as an independent part. It can be emotion, repentance, improvement or a piece of paper.
The above is the answer I hastily wrote according to my own practical experience, for reference only! Can't find welcome experts to criticize and correct me!
In one go.
Logic takes precedence over grammar.
No matter how good the paper is, it must be revised many times.
Connect sentences with prepositions.
Don't use long sentences if you can use short sentences.
Pay attention to the logical correspondence between the frontier and the discussion.
We must emphasize the innovation of scientific problems and results.
Don't list the quotations in the paper, it's better to integrate them into a coherent narrative.
Need to sum up the shortcomings and development direction.
1) topic, and write English comparison, modify and determine the topic. 2) Preface, briefly introduce the current level, what important problems have not been solved, what results and conclusions you have obtained by what methods and steps, and what value and significance are there. 3) Main body, research method-the research content (1, 2, 3, ...), 4) Discussion. 5) conclusion. Finally, write an abstract and translate it into English. 6) References. Finally, put the abstract under the title and above the preface.
I just came to see if I shared my experience. I also want to see it. Really afraid of being dominated by papers!
First of all, whether the paper can be accepted by the journal is the most important. Whether your idea is innovative or not and whether it can arouse the interest of editors and reviewers is the most important thing. In order to achieve the above effect and avoid doing useless work, I suggest you read more domestic and foreign literature related to your research, do a good job of literature review, and find innovations from it.
Secondly, with a good idea, an excellent journal paper should have the following points: fascinating introduction, incisive and convincing literature review, rigorous and scientific data analysis, and feasible conclusions and suggestions. Generally, the structure of articles in different journals is similar, but it is suggested that it is best to read the submission guide of journals in detail and strictly follow the requirements of journals.
Finally, an excellent paper basically has to undergo many tempering and revisions, even the adjustment of the article structure, so in the end you may find that your final draft is completely different from your first draft.
The academic road is a long and lonely practice, but as long as you take it seriously, you will get what you want!