The implementation plan puts forward that the evaluation of medical ethics and professional behavior should be placed at the top of the evaluation of health professionals, and the performance of medical staff in major natural disasters or public health emergencies should be taken as an important part of the evaluation of medical ethics. Scientific and reasonable treatment of papers, in all aspects of job title evaluation, post appointment, etc., do not take the number of papers and SCI (scientific citation index) and other related indicators as the prerequisite and direct basis for evaluation.
Treat papers published in domestic and foreign journals equally, and encourage more achievements to be published in influential domestic journals. Do not directly link the honorary title of talents with the evaluation of professional titles.
The coverage of diseases, the number of cases of single diseases, the number of complications, the therapeutic effect, the scope of surgery or operation, the difficulty and quality of surgery, the average length of stay, the average cost, the quality of prescription review, the quality of nursing service, and the number of cases handled on the spot are taken as important evaluation indicators to scientifically and accurately evaluate their professional ability and level.
Special reports on diagnosis and treatment of common diseases and frequently-occurring diseases, medical record analysis, popularization and application of new technologies and new projects, times of health education and health promotion, number of health records management, performance of corresponding public health service functions, handling of emergencies, emergency medical rescue, etc. As an important content of professional title evaluation.