Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - One thing, one discussion, urgent composition! ! ! About 500 words.
One thing, one discussion, urgent composition! ! ! About 500 words.
Design concept

"One thing, one discussion" is the basic training for learning to write argumentative essays. The "one thing" here can be a thing, a story, a sentence, a phenomenon, an article, a movie, etc. It can even refer to someone's words, an action or a detail in an event, etc. The "one discussion" here refers to focusing on one's own point of view from a certain angle, so that this point of view is clear, convincing and acceptable. "One discussion" refers to expressing one's opinion on an event, a phenomenon or a material read in life.

Guide the writing process

First of all, sort out the main points

1. Basic writing. The article generally consists of two parts: narration and reasoning. Tell one thing first, then discuss it, express your opinion and explain a truth.

2. Basic structure: summing up facts-putting forward arguments-proving arguments-concluding the full text. The parts of "summarizing facts" and "putting forward arguments" are the "introduction" of the article, which requires writing and asking questions; The "proof argument" part is the "theory" part of the article, which needs to analyze and demonstrate the problem. This part can also add some materials related to reality; The "ending the full text" part is the "conclusion" part of the article and also the part to solve the problem.

3. Writing skills.

(1) Analyze materials and identify arguments.

The projection shows a piece of material:

After Einstein became famous, the king and queen of Belgium invited him to visit. At the appointed time, the king sent a palace car to meet him at the railway station. The train came, but the driver couldn't find Einstein, so he went back empty-handed and reported to the king that the professor didn't come. But half an hour later, Einstein came wearing a dusty raincoat and a pair of old leather shoes. It turned out that the driver only looked at the clothes and didn't recognize people. Einstein came on foot.

Students can analyze the following arguments from the materials: ① Einstein lived a simple life; (2) The common fault of recognizing clothes but not people; 3. Look at the essence of the problem, don't stay on the surface phenomenon; (4) Einstein did not put on airs and was approachable; ⑤ After Einstein became famous, he focused on scientific career and did not pursue personal enjoyment; 6. When you pick up the station, especially when you pick up people you don't know, you should make an appointment to contact, so that there will be no mistakes made by driver Wang. Comparing several arguments, except that (6) the guiding materials are too general, and (3) the lack of individuality and the pursuit of profundity are a bit far-fetched, other arguments are suitable for discussion. If you talk about achievements according to ①, you can't expect too much in life; According to (2), it is vulgar and superficial to talk about judging people by their appearances; According to 4, it can be said that truly cultivated scholars will not be vain and will not care about details; According to (5), it can be said that a great scientist should put the public interest first and strive to benefit all mankind, instead of pursuing personal enjoyment.

(2) A clear-cut attitude. Give positive affirmation and praise to beautiful things; For ugly things, we must clearly express negation and hatred; Reasonable analysis and enthusiastic help should be given to the incorrect words and deeds of classmates and friends, such as destroying the environment, copying homework, and treating people on birthdays.

(3) Thinking is innovative. The matter itself is often multifaceted. Thinking and analyzing the same thing from different angles can dig out different connotations and draw different views and opinions. We should expand our thinking as much as possible and strive to write new ideas from a new angle and level.

(4) The combination of narration and discussion is based on understanding. Generally, it is straight to the point, and generally introduces the events, phenomena or materials to be demonstrated around the argument; Then discuss the matter on your own and put forward your own views; Then choose the appropriate method to illustrate your argument.

(5) Pay attention to the internal relationship between matter and reason, and prevent replacing discussion with Syria.

Second, examples to prove.

On "Deception"

As the exam approaches, several boring guys in the class are discussing all kinds of cheating tricks again. Although it only makes people laugh, it proves the fact that the phenomenon of "cheating" in exams still exists in many schools to varying degrees.

Why do people cheat in every exam? In fact, this is not surprising. Cheaters just want to get high marks. They are glorious, praised by teachers and happy by parents. There are also some people who have no choice but to take risks and be confused, afraid of being criticized by teachers, scolded by parents and beaten with sticks. Cheating in exams is also called "peeking". In the eyes of some people, it is really a wonderful thing: having fun at ordinary times, you can easily get high marks with a little calculation during the exam. Cheaters only know to use "fake scores" to satisfy temporary vanity, but they don't know that "a thousand miles of embankment is destroyed by an ant nest". A little cheating won't make him heinous, but it has planted an ugly seed in his heart.

Not to mention the disappointment of teachers, the punishment of the school, and the eyes of other students after cheating was discovered. Even if you get away with it this time, are you really so practical? Can you promise it won't happen in the future? I once remembered that a classmate wrote down his feelings after cheating: "I have been living in extreme fear and my spirit is about to collapse." I'm afraid to meet my parents, teachers and friends. ..... I finally know what is unbearable. "

Yes, nothing is more gratifying than having an open mind, and nothing is more painful than feeling guilty and losing the trust of others; The vanity gained by lies will eventually be shattered. An American educator once said, "Students who cheat in exams will also cheat in work and marriage. What kind of society can we expect when the good quality of honesty has no place in a country? " When you step into society, do you also have to cheat with books and notes? Deceiving teachers and parents is not deceiving yourself in the end!

On the other hand, it is wrong for students to cheat, but can this only blame students? Shouldn't teachers and parents take some responsibility? Some teachers and parents blindly regard "score" as the only criterion to measure a student. Many students cheat under this pressure. Shouldn't this cause teachers and parents to reflect?

Once again, I would like to advise all students: instead of trying their best to engage in "underground activities" in the exam, it is better to study hard at ordinary times. Cheating is an anesthetic, and we should stay away from it like drugs.

Students think and discuss the examples to confirm the basic writing methods, basic structures and writing skills summarized above, and get inspiration from them.