The defense scores are divided into failing, passing, good and excellent. According to the graduation defense organized by colleges and universities, teachers score according to the comprehensive situation of students' papers and defenses. The defense examines students' comprehensive abilities such as professional knowledge, professional application mastery and professional cognition. According to the graduation defense scoring standard, the teacher scores according to the students' defense situation, and the teacher gives the final defense score after professional discussion.
If the defense is decent, the professional knowledge is solid, the content of the paper is mastered, and the knowledge points can be discussed around the paper, and the defense score is generally above the pass; If you don't fully grasp it in the process of defense, you won't answer it, and the content of the paper is unclear. You will be given unqualified defense scores and ask students to participate in the second defense.
Defensive scoring standard:
Excellent (90- 100), accurately grasping the viewpoints and themes of the paper, responding quickly to the teacher's questions, not only answering all the questions, but also further expounding the teacher's questions; The defense language is fluent and logical; Understand the background and related academic viewpoints and categories involved in the paper, and have your own opinions on the problem.
Good (80-89 points), familiar with the paper, able to understand the teacher's intention to ask questions and respond quickly; Can basically answer the questions raised by the teacher, and can further elaborate on most questions; The defense language is basically fluent; Have a certain understanding of the knowledge and related categories involved in the paper, and have their own understanding of the topics discussed.
Medium (70-79 points): the graduation design workload meets the requirements of graduation design task book; The design scheme is basically correct, with certain analysis and demonstration, and the logic is basically clear; Master basic theoretical knowledge, have the ability to solve practical engineering and technical problems independently and have a certain theoretical basis.
After passing the exam (60-69), it takes more than two prompts to correctly understand the teacher's intention to ask questions. Some questions can't be answered or completely answered, and the main idea can't be grasped, so the language organization and expression ability is weak; Familiar with the paper or although familiar, but basically rote; Lack of basic understanding of the background knowledge and scope involved in the paper.
Fail (below 60 points), can't answer the questions raised by the teacher and answered in the paper, and can't answer more than half of other related questions.
The writing of defense comments includes: whether students can correctly understand the main idea of the teacher's question; Whether the defense language is fluent and how expressive the language is; Whether you are familiar with the paper and whether you have your own understanding of the views and concepts of the paper; Do you know the background knowledge and related categories of the thesis?