Argument: Thank you for your wonderful argument, but we disagree on several aspects: …
Please allow me to explain our point of view: loneliness refers to a state that is not completely visible, and the so-called loneliness refers to a psychology that cannot communicate with others or be satisfied through communication. And inevitability refers to the inevitable and unchangeable trend in the development and change of things. Necessity is determined by the nature of things. What we are discussing today is whether loneliness is inevitable, that is, from the perspective of human foundation and human nature, whether loneliness is inevitable as long as people participate, and whether loneliness is inevitable and difficult to change in one's life. We firmly believe that human loneliness is not inevitable for the following reasons:
First of all, loneliness is a relatively advanced emotion, a derivative of human evolution to a certain extent, so it is not born at all. According to the dictionary of psychology, "Emotion is people's attitude and experience about whether objective things meet their own needs", while psychology points out that people's basic emotions include joy, anger, sadness, fear, love and hate, but not loneliness. When humans were in the caveman period, when humans were in the wild, when they were born, when they were babies at first, they didn't know what loneliness was. Therefore, fundamentally speaking, human loneliness is not inevitable. In terms of emotional needs, loneliness is the second stage of human needs, that is, social needs. Therefore, when human beings do not meet the needs of food and clothing in the first stage, loneliness is out of the question.
Secondly, loneliness is not inevitable, and not everyone will have it. The Chinese Dictionary tells us that loneliness is actually an extreme word, and its moderate state is similar to loss. The mistake of other debaters today is that they can't distinguish the definition of loneliness, but equate loss and even loneliness with loneliness. What we should face up to today is that in fact, in most cases, loneliness does not really come, but stays in the stage of loss and loneliness, and this psychological feeling can be completely eliminated through self-mediation. After all, human individuals do not exist alone, and they can seek help from people around them. In interpersonal communication, loneliness will be greatly reduced, and loneliness will not be achieved. Is there anyone who is always lonely? Very few. So relief is something that everyone can do. Similarly, as long as it is eliminated in advance, loneliness will not come true, which is entirely possible.
Moreover, loneliness is not inevitable. Loneliness is sometimes because it is difficult to understand your own voice, as another debater said. However, after thousands of years of development, human culture has been unprecedentedly prosperous. People who are lonely all their lives, such as Nietzsche and Van Gogh, have emerged one after another. Even if you can't find a heart-to-heart person between people of the same generation and the same region, it doesn't mean that loneliness can't be eliminated. We can use the Internet and other high-tech means to find friends. You can even find people similar to yourself among the sages, and make spiritual contact by reading their books. No matter by what means, this loneliness can be eliminated through our efforts.
Because of loneliness ... (let me repeat three points), we insist that human loneliness is not inevitable.
Summary of attack and defense. I can't help you. I should combine your offensive and defensive writing. If your attack and defense is to catch each other's flaws on the spot (this is more common), then the summary of attack and defense should be summarized as follows: "In fact, their logical flaws have been exposed in the previous link, mainly including the following points", and then if time permits, I will elaborate on my own. If your attack and defense is to improve your point of view, then prepare your own specific statement according to the argument, and it is best to solve the problems pointed out by the other party in attack and defense.
The above is just my humble opinion. I wonder if it will help you. I wish you success in the game ~ ~