It is controversial whether to publish a small thesis after graduation. The retro school insists that if you get a master's degree, even a decent academic paper has not been published, which is inconsistent with emotion and reason; Modernists advocate that the enrollment expansion of graduate students makes it an indisputable fact that the master's degree is flooded. Instead of forcing students to write papers for new words, it is better to completely abolish this hard rule; There are even fence-sitters who think that both of them are reasonable, and they can only move with the camera and improvise. The fierce debate not only confuses students, but also makes some tutors doubt. Do master students want to publish small papers? If the school stipulates that students must publish papers before they can graduate, they are duty-bound and will try their best to meet the examination requirements for thesis defense qualification. People who have a high level of research or participate in many projects are naturally familiar with writing papers. Those who have no intention of clamoring with scholars or being independent have to rely on their own efforts without foreign aid. CNKI is the greatest guarantee of their academic resources, and copying and pasting is the best weapon for their thesis writing. Under the guidance of the spirit of patchwork and everyone for me, it is also a piece of cake to complete a small paper. Since publication is the most important purpose, publication is equal to success regardless of the level of the paper. A few hundred RMB is the passport to publish a paper. As for whether the article really has academic value and whether it can really reflect the scientific research quality of researchers, it is demanding to use this standard to measure the papers written by many master students. Especially those small masters who only need two years to complete their studies, it is even more difficult to expect them to publish high-level academic papers under the tension of studying credits for one year and writing graduation thesis for one year. In a word, it is normal for colleges and universities to firmly implement the strategy of publishing long live if schools want papers. If the school does not make it mandatory, do graduate students still need to publish small papers? I'm afraid most students' choices are: more than one thing is better than less. Since the school doesn't make hard and fast rules, why bother the god? If you have time, take more certificates and go to the on-site units for internships. However, when I got to graduate school, I couldn't even write a decent paper. Why don't I just take part in the work? Is it really so cost-effective to spend a few years just for a declining diploma? How difficult is it to write a high-quality paper? With the development of science and technology, most simple studies have been collected by predecessors, leaving behind hard bones. I finally found a piece that looked very chewy, only to find that someone had beaten me to it, and there was no meat on it when it was your turn to chew. For example, to write an article on project evaluation, it was only necessary to sort the index system constructed by fuzzy evaluation method. Now, it would be ridiculous if you only know how to use this research method. Words must be called complex systems, books need systematic thinking and theories need to be improved. The increase in the difficulty of thesis writing directly determines that the writing will and investment of graduate students are gradually disappearing. Now that all the good things have disappeared, the rest are hard to write, and it doesn't hurt not to publish a paper. From a rational point of view, not writing about nature is the best policy. Many graduate students are puzzled whether they are willing to spend a lot of time to finish a delicate paper. Is it really worth paying so much just for an article? I believe that such questions have appeared in the minds of many students more than once. In retrospect, before entering the postgraduate study, many students dreamed of gaining something on the road of study. Why didn't you go far at last? Because we unconsciously took a fork in the road, took a shortcut, and even were led astray by smart and willing people. Looking back, I found that things were different, so I ended up in a hurry. The small thesis written in the master's stage is often the first work of most students' lives, which is precious. If there is no effort, it will be a little violent. The level of the thesis is limited by many factors, and all the words written are not necessarily top grades. Therefore, we don't insist that the thesis written by master students must be meticulous, but we must be able to read the author's painstaking efforts from every word of the thesis. As the saying goes, chess is three levels long, which means that a person may not be able to play high-level chess, but he can appreciate the tricks played by experts. Just as football fans will say that Diego Diego Maradona has gone through five hurdles and killed six generals, few people can reproduce as brilliantly as Messi. This is especially true when writing academic papers. The words we write are often not what we think, but what our expressive ability and thinking level can achieve. No one doesn't want to write a classic handed down from ancient times, but it may not be possible. Perhaps most people can't get rid of the famous Han Qiaosheng's law, that is, when explaining the competition, Han Qiaosheng looked at player A in his eyes, remembered player B in his mind, and said player C in his mouth. In fact, it refers to player D, but the audience thought it was player E. Some small papers, carefully examined, have roughly the same effect, which shows the difficulty of a good article. Since you can't write well, you should work hard on understanding and appreciation. Long-term reading of classic literature, frequent communication with good scholars and regular guidance from high-level scholars will naturally increase students' understanding and appreciation ability. Even if you can't write an impressive article, at least you can gradually have the ability to distinguish authenticity from pros and cons, and you can point out whether other people's papers conform to academic norms, whether you have the necessary elements for a high-quality paper, and whether you can understand the author's intention after reading a document. Only when a person keeps in touch with high-level things will his realm gradually improve and his requirements for himself become more and more strict. If you don't really read the classic literature in this field, it is difficult to understand what real scientific research is, and it is easy to be blinded by the frog's point of view, become arrogant, and the possibility of writing words that surprise the world is getting smaller and smaller.