(2) In this incident, we can think from two aspects. On the one hand, our journalists should always keep the principle of objective, fair and true news reporting, and don't change our working principle because of the performance of some people. On the other hand, good social supervision is the cornerstone of social fairness and justice. Whether officials, scholars, entrepreneurs, cultural workers like Degang Guo, or ordinary people, "how to face the media" is actually a mirror to test whether this person has good "civic quality, professional quality, legal awareness including cultural level".
(3) There is a special legal term called "voluntary public figure" in the civil law, which means that citizens subjectively seek to become public figures, and are also regarded as voluntarily accepting the supervision of the public and public opinion. In other words, public figures not only have the right to enjoy social "flowers" and "applause", but also have the obligation to actively accept media and social supervision. From this perspective, any public figure should respect the media and the public's right to know.
We need to think deeply. Society is too tolerant of "public figures" making mistakes, so that "public figures" do not feel the pain of making mistakes, and some are "too arrogant". The "error cost" of public figures in Chinese mainland is low, and the whole society is too tolerant of the mistakes of public figures. Perhaps, this can be said to be a kind of social civilization, but we must be vigilant. When tolerance is excessive, it will easily become a kind of connivance and doting. When this mentality is distorted, it will not make public figures feel the tolerance of society, but will make them forget the cost of making mistakes and even "harm" society.