Related Tags: Commercial Insurance Development
Today's society is a risky society. In this society, all kinds of risks faced by people need to be effectively dealt with. Therefore, how to effectively allocate risk protection resources has become one of the core issues of risk management. Among various means to deal with risks, insurance is a traditional and effective mechanism. There are three types of insurance: mutual cooperation insurance, commercial insurance and social insurance. How should these three types of insurance be divided? How to coordinate development? This is a question of great practical significance. This paper focuses on the relationship between social insurance and commercial insurance and related issues. From the risk of insurance, there are many similarities between personal insurance and personal injury liability insurance in social insurance and commercial insurance. Therefore, the reasonable division of labor and cooperation between commercial insurance and social insurance has always been an important issue of academic research, industry practice and people's concern. This paper holds that social insurance and commercial insurance are two major resources of risk protection services, and should be reasonably combined through effective mechanisms to reduce the risk management cost of the whole society and improve the risk protection level of all members of society. First, the relationship between social insurance and commercial insurance There are three types of insurance in modern society. Judging from the time when they appeared, they were mutual cooperation insurance, commercial insurance and social insurance in turn. Among them, the exact date of birth of mutual insurance and commercial insurance is difficult to verify. It is generally believed that mutual insurance has a history of more than 3,000 years, and the oldest existing commercial insurance contract in the modern sense is 1347+05438 10, which was signed in Genoa, Italy on October 23rd. It can be seen that commercial insurance existed at least at that time. When social insurance was born, the academic circles generally issued behavioral signs with the German sickness insurance law of 1883. It is worth noting that the emergence of three kinds of insurance is closely related to the changes of the times, historical evolution and the progress of human civilization. The emergence of commercial insurance behavior is the product of the development of commodity economy to a certain stage, while the emergence of social insurance system is the result of government intervention in the risk protection service market. Mutual cooperation insurance and commercial insurance are both voluntary behaviors. Economic subjects who face specific risks and have certain ability to pay transfer risks by joining mutual aid organizations or buying insurance, so risk protection service is a market. Under this mechanism, the risk guarantee resources can be optimized to some extent. However, with the changes of the times and risks, this market clearly shows its defects: the poor can't use such means to transfer risks because of their insufficient ability to pay, especially with the process of industrialization and urbanization, the risks of social members increase, the gap between the rich and the poor widens, and the number of social members who have the demand for risk protection but lack the ability to pay increases, which has formed serious social problems. As a result, the government began to intervene in the field of risk protection services. 1883 Germany is the first to introduce the social insurance system, which shows that the government not only provides survival risk protection services for the poor through social assistance, but also provides basic risk protection services for all working-class people. After World War II, developed countries have gradually extended the coverage of social insurance system to all citizens, which means that the government directly provides risk protection services for the basic risks of social members. From an economic point of view, this is the result of government intervention in the risk protection service market, because the risk protection service market with mutual insurance and commercial insurance as the main body failed, and the government intervened through social insurance. In this process, mutual cooperation insurance and commercial insurance with a long history have gradually changed their business scope and service objects-providing various risk protection services other than social insurance for members of society who have the ability to pay. After the 1970s, the economic crisis triggered by the oil crisis triggered the worldwide social insurance system reform. Social insurance funds in many countries are in crisis, so we have to take various measures to control or even reduce social insurance benefits. Its core is to limit and reduce the labor cost of employers and the government's responsibility to social insurance funds. This is what some scholars call "government failure leads to the reform of social insurance system". In this context, the position of commercial insurance in the whole risk protection service system has been re-recognized, and its positioning has become clearer-providing various risk protection services other than social insurance for members who have the ability to pay, and providing supplementary insurance services based on social insurance. After such a process, the academic circle of risk protection has gradually formed such a * * * understanding: based on the basic risks of social members and the responsibility of the government, the main types of social insurance are social endowment insurance, social medical insurance, unemployment insurance, work injury insurance and maternity insurance, which are directly handled by the government, with a certain amount of social insurance premium injected and the responsibility of the fund assumed. It is precisely because social insurance is handled by the government that social equity must be the core value orientation and the basic livelihood of social members must be guaranteed as the goal. This concept is generally accepted by academic circles and political circles, and is embodied in the laws of most countries. Commercial insurance and mutual cooperation insurance are organized by non-governmental organizations (enterprises or non-profit organizations) and belong to market behavior. The former is for profit and the latter is non-profit. In terms of security items and security levels, commercial insurance and mutual assistance and cooperation insurance are set up according to social needs, and members of the society choose voluntarily. When the risks covered by these two types of insurance are the same as those covered by social insurance, social insurance is the basic protection, and the other two types are supplementary protection, that is, social members must participate in social insurance first, and then participate in commercial insurance or mutual cooperation insurance, unless there is no such protection in social insurance. Second, the crowding-out effect of social insurance development on commercial insurance In China, insurance in the modern sense is imported. Commercial insurance began at 1805, and the universal implementation of social insurance system began at 195 1. After 1978, the market-oriented economic system reform was gradually launched, and the economy and society began to transform. The social insurance system, which was originally adapted to the planned economy system, has all kinds of unsuitable symptoms and needs to be reformed urgently. In the past 20 years, China has carried out a series of reforms in the field of social insurance, and successively promulgated and implemented a series of new systems and policies. A new framework of social insurance system that is compatible with the level of economic and social development is taking shape and developing steadily in the direction of covering urban and rural areas and benefiting the whole people. Judging from the past 30 years, China's commercial insurance has developed in the process of recovery. Judging from the relationship with social insurance, commercial insurance once assumed some social insurance responsibilities when the social insurance system was not perfect during the transition period. However, with the development of social insurance, commercial insurance has given way to social insurance in some fields, which makes some insurance workers feel confused. In fact, many measures in the early stage of China's economic system reform were based on reducing the level of workers' risk protection and employees' welfare. In this context, a considerable number of wage earners lack due social insurance, and some even cannot get their wages in full and on time. In this way, some workers and members of society are guaranteed by personal insurance and personal injury liability insurance in commercial insurance, which also creates certain development opportunities for commercial insurance companies. For example, in the 1980s and 1990s, many employers bought supplementary pension insurance, accident insurance and even family property insurance for their employees, and some also bought employer liability insurance. At that time, group insurance business accounted for a large proportion in the total life insurance business of insurance companies. However, with the expansion of social insurance coverage, the group life insurance business of insurance companies is no longer "beautiful", especially in the provinces with rapid and thorough economic transformation, the social insurance work is vigorously promoted, and the group life insurance business is declining faster. In recent 10 years, new basic old-age insurance system for employees, social old-age insurance system for urban and rural residents, basic medical insurance system for employees (hereinafter referred to as "employee medical insurance"), new rural cooperative medical system (hereinafter referred to as "new rural cooperative medical system"), basic medical insurance system for urban residents (hereinafter referred to as "urban medical insurance"), unemployment insurance system, industrial injury insurance system and maternity insurance system have been introduced one after another, and the coverage of social insurance has increased. In fact, under the premise of a certain security demand and ability to pay, the demand for commercial insurance naturally decreases because compulsory social insurance meets part of the security needs of social members. In other words, part of the demand for commercial insurance has been forcibly replaced. In the initial substitution stage, the substitution rate is often higher, that is, less social insurance often replaces more commercial insurance demand. At the same time, the higher the level of social insurance, the stronger the absolute substitution for commercial insurance, so the greater the restriction on commercial insurance. On the contrary, the lower the level of social insurance, the greater the development space of commercial insurance. Third, the development space of commercial insurance brought by the deepening reform of social insurance After a long period of reform and construction, China's social insurance system has formed a new framework system, but there is still room for improvement, which needs deepening reform to achieve. At present, there are three most prominent problems in the field of social insurance in China: one is the lack of fairness, the other is the lack of sustainability, and the third is the low efficiency of system operation. There are two keys to solve these problems: one is to establish the construction idea of multi-level social security system, and the other is to define the responsibility of the government reasonably, so as to determine the appropriate level of security. More than a decade ago, the academic community basically reached a consensus that the principle of social security system reform is "wide coverage, low level and multi-level". In recent years, there has been a new and more complete formulation-full coverage, basic protection, multi-level and sustainable. I think there is another word, which is to change "wide coverage" to "full coverage". The so-called full coverage means that everyone should participate in social insurance for basic risk protection projects. Therefore, to "accelerate the establishment of a social security system covering urban and rural residents", there are two key issues to be clarified: First, which projects cover urban and rural residents? Second, what is its protection level? The so-called basic guarantee is to determine an appropriate level of protection, which should be determined according to the basic needs of social members for risk protection, the responsibility of the government and the financing capacity of society, that is, it is usually said to be compatible with the level of economic and social development. The so-called multi-level means that the social security system consists of two parts: basic security and supplementary security. Social security projects directly organized by the government only provide basic protection for members of society, which is the first level. On this basis, make full use of social forces to develop risk protection, including families, employers, social organizations and various non-governmental organizations, and establish the second and third levels of protection. The so-called sustainability means that all social security systems should be able to run continuously and healthily for a long time. To realize the sustainable operation of social security system, we need: moderate security level+scientific system design+effective management service. Among them, it is very important to determine the appropriate protection level. We believe that only the basic elements can be fully covered; Only by maintaining the basics can it be sustainable; Only by ensuring the basics can we establish a multi-level risk protection system. In modern society, the government has the responsibility to provide basic risk protection services for all members of society. In addition to social assistance and public welfare, the government mainly realizes this responsibility through social insurance. What needs to be emphasized is that the social insurance service provided by the government is only a basic guarantee, not a high-level full guarantee, otherwise it will affect social efficiency and cultivate "lazy people". The demand for risk protection beyond the basic projects and above the basic level of protection should be met with the help of social forces and market mechanisms. At this time, the government's responsibility is to formulate relevant rules, assume regulatory responsibilities, and ensure its standardized, healthy and orderly operation, rather than directly arranging. In addition, it is necessary to clarify the responsibilities of governments at all levels and properly handle the relationship between the central and local governments, the relationship between higher and lower governments and the interests between regions. Based on this understanding, in the coming period, the focus of the reform and construction of the social insurance system and the resulting commercial insurance development space should be in the following aspects: First, the reform of the social old-age security system in institutions and institutions and the development of occupational annuities. From the perspective of social equity, we should reform the retirement security system of government agencies and institutions, reform the basic old-age insurance system for employees, realize the unification of the social old-age insurance system for all working-class people (employees in government agencies, institutions, enterprises and various economic and social organizations), and then create conditions to gradually realize the unification of the basic old-age insurance system for all citizens. In this context, occupational annuities (including enterprise annuities) will have new development space.