I can also write famous articles and articles, and I am still immersed in the fun of literary creation. Only today, under the pressure of various exams, "partiality" is regarded as an extremely dangerous signal. Is it really dangerous? I don't think so, but it should be a good thing It is precisely because of the obvious hints that you have an understanding of your potential, which is also very beneficial for you to choose your own development direction. However, under such an education system, students with extremely serious partial subjects have to face the subjects they hate and have to force themselves to be interested in them. Isn't this killing a talent's youth? Isn't it a waste of a talent's life?
What kind of talents does society need? In fact, as the professor said, people with profound and extensive majors are needed, not the "all-round development" advocated now. True all-round development refers to morality, behavior and so on to a great extent. Only by focusing on cultivating a certain specialty can we cultivate timely and suitable professionals.
Of course, some people may think that learning more other kinds of knowledge is helpful to exercise thinking and develop intelligence. These are undeniable, but they should also be based on interest and voluntariness, instead of using the current "exam-score" incentive method.
We sometimes complain that there are too many people at the root of the present educational situation in China. But I don't want to agree. I think that as a "talent", he should be a "person" first, and then a "talent". This means that he becomes an adult first, and then he becomes a talent. Isn't China's population of nearly 654.38+0.3 billion the basis for training talents? For example, if there are more raw materials, there will be more finished products. Such a huge population should have produced more talents, but the current situation is not optimistic. Why doesn't a vast country with a population of 1/4 even have a Nobel Prize winner? In fact, there are many China people standing on the Nobel podium, but why are they all from other nationalities? Leaving this aside, at least it shows that China people are fully capable of winning this prize. To do this, we need not only the attention and support of the whole society, but also the quality of these researchers who enter the laboratory. So now, what can't be seen in front of us?
The purpose of education is not to cultivate all people into "generalists" like Einstein. Even Einstein had his selectivity in doing science. The definition of talent can't be just a machine that can go through five hurdles and cut off six generals, nor can it be just a bachelor with a high degree of education, but a person with a good mind who can make a real contribution to the whole society and even the whole mankind.
Using this standard to measure a person, maybe his grades in school are lower than yours, maybe he didn't go to college, maybe his work is not as decent as yours, but you will find that he is a talent, because there is no distinction between high and low contributions.
Since ancient times, we have gone through too many detours on the road of exploring education and paid a heavy price every time. At present, the reform of the education system is still very difficult, but education is the foundation of the country, and today's education is the country's tomorrow. In this necessary situation and crisis, it is urgent to prevent brain drain.