1. Was there science in ancient China? The concept of pragmatism is not conducive to the creation of scientists, especially to the progress of basic science. We can invent the compass, but we can't find the magnetic field. We invented black powder, but I don't know the chemical changes behind this research.

2, there are problems in ancient research methods, which are too subjective and arbitrary. The ancients saw water drops on the surface of metal, and the direct conclusion was that "gold is rich in water", and the Five Elements Movement was "invented" in this way.

Interestingly, many people now think that the five elements theory is awesome, and they can only say that some people are too confused.

3. China's study of ancient problems is too effective for promotion and wealth. When Zou Yan invented the Five Elements Theory, he advocated himself and his theory. He doesn't believe in the theory of five elements.

For China people, it is a job to promote useless research. "... Relatively speaking, Europeans regard scientific research as a cause, especially after the establishment of the intellectual property system.

For modern times, "Patriot" is not as sought after by scientists as "Patriot".

No one has heard of management problems. He talked about thousands of fans in the Book of Changes, saying that "too much faith in science is not a good thing" made him a "master of Chinese studies".

Cui said that the news was red, and opposing GM made him a hero, but this company of heroes sodium chloride didn't know anything.