Let's see what he used, what rhetoric, and whether it was appropriate. Can he write the argument simply and clearly, use it well, whether the argument he used is appropriate and whether the final conclusion is correct? Whether innovative methods are used or not is still the same.

Please refer to:

Narrative class

Elegant and elegant words, vivid scenery. The layout is novel and the text is concise. Detailed explanation, clear and gratifying. Write a landscape and get down to business. Clear organization, rigorous structure, free and easy, interesting and meaningful. Light and far away, relaxed, meaningful and subtle. Plain and straightforward, and romantic. Concise and fluent, with profound implications. Far-reaching and far-reaching, different from many tastes, vivid description. The content is tortuous and intriguing. Interesting, very enjoyable to read. The story is compact and gripping. Fluent and tactful, true and true, rich in content and fluent in writing. Your leisurely travel and delicate description. Tell the truth and speak freely. The words are calm and elegant. Narrative lyricism, are quite appropriate to write a beautiful and vivid scenery. Smooth layout and realistic description. Many words are redundant and the words are not vivid. The content is poor and there are too many typos. It's too early to finish, and it's not enough to write vigorously and unconventional. The article is full of emotion and touching. Detailed description and good organization. Every word, flowing. Exquisite, lifelike, extraordinary, can fly. The meaning between the lines is calm and elegant. Fresh, smooth and natural. Rich in materials and vivid in words. Quite humorous, relaxed style, natural and smooth, methodical.