1, you can't turn a blind eye. If you find mistakes in the published SCI articles, don't ignore them. If you let others read it, it is not only irresponsible to yourself, to the magazine, but also to others.

2. Contact in time. When we find an article is wrong, we should contact the magazine, explain which journal it was published in, what kind of problems appeared in which paper, explain the problems and attach the contents that should be revised. Generally, you should tell the editor that it will not affect the conclusion of the article and send the revised correct article to the editor.

Ask them to check again. Pay attention to the second interview. Otherwise, your revised article will be edited by blind reviewers and then strictly examined by them. Your article is likely to be rejected. You might as well say it yourself.

3. Demonstrate the errors found by the magazines and relevant reviewers. If mistakes do exist, the magazine association will issue an errata statement to tell readers that there are mistakes somewhere in the paper and correct them to minimize them. Corrigendum to papers is still common in academic circles. Don't ignore it for fear that pointing out mistakes will bring you unnecessary trouble or affect your reputation in academia.

You know, people in the same industry generally pay more attention to academic papers in their own industry, and others will point them out if they don't point them out, so once problems are found, they must be dealt with in time. In addition to the errata of the paper, you can also choose to withdraw the manuscript, correct the mistakes in the paper after the withdrawal and then submit it. This method will waste more time and energy, so it is not recommended that you withdraw the manuscript.