However, looking at the research and papers on the effect of saccharification on the skin, a large part of them are not mentioned at all, and what is mentioned is not very certain (basically the word may is used to speculate), so I actually have some doubts about how yellow it can become.
Theoretically, if Maillard reaction does produce yellowish brown products.
But because of this, it is more appropriate to say that the skin turns yellow because the saccharification process is a bit absolute, and that the saccharification process may have some influence on the skin turning yellow.
There are many factors involved in skin yellowing, such as age, aging itself, sun exposure, skin color, etc., and there may be cross-effects between them. I don't think it's reasonable to associate the sensational appearance of "yellow-faced woman" with one of them.
Moreover, the effect of saccharification on the skin is also a relatively unimportant one in the process of saccharification on the body. If the saccharification reaction alone is serious enough to turn you from normal to "yellow-faced woman", then go and have a check-up. You may already have severe diabetes. ......
What are the daily anti-saccharification methods?
▍ Diet may be the most reliable step of "anti-saccharification"
Diet is indeed a very important point in the saccharification process.
On the one hand, diet will provide sugar, and sugar itself is the most important raw material for saccharification.
On the other hand, some cooking processes will form AGEs themselves. Studies have shown that about 10% of AGEs produced in these cooking processes will not be digested after eating.
But from an operational point of view, it may be better for everyone to control from the first point. Because the formation of AGEs in cooking requires raw materials, temperature, time and cooking methods, it is not clear how cooking can produce more AGEs. It is unfair to simply say that frying, frying and frying are not good.
▍ hypoglycemia? Diet, don't give up sugar completely
Giving up sugar completely does more harm than good to the body, because sugar is the most efficient energy used by the body, and there is no reason not to eat it.
A few days ago, a new study was released. Last year, a large-scale study found that too much or too little carbohydrate intake would shorten life expectancy.
So, if you meet someone who suggests that you only eat vegetables and leaves or steak every day to live a long and healthy life, just slap him.
Of course, it is no good drinking Coca-Cola every day. Fat people like me who can't live without Coca-Cola drink low sugar or zero.
What you have to do is two things:
Don't overdo it.
Add some low GI carbohydrates.
Not eating sugar is not good, and eating too much is not good, so it is necessary to control the sugar intake other than three meals.
Milk tea, coffee, drinks and other drinks, especially in the hardest hit areas. I remember that Guangdong media broke out before, including several stores of online celebrities. Not only is the content of "less sugar" milk tea almost the same as that of ordinary cola, but the content of a cup of so-called "sugar-free milk tea" in some shops was found to be 5- 10g.
Among the three meals, low GI carbohydrates are recommended. For example, compared with ordinary white rice, the GI of coarse grain rice will be lower, which is healthier for the body from the perspective of blood sugar management. Pay attention to collocation in diet and eat more vegetables.
Anti-saccharification skin care products, sesame or watermelon?
Compared with sunscreen and normal anti-free products, "anti-saccharification" is undoubtedly sesame.
Of course, sesame seeds are also important.
But from the perspective of priorities, or how much money you have, it is more appropriate to take a big watermelon first. Make sure you have all the watermelons, and then choose sesame seeds.
External factors such as sun protection have the greatest influence on skin aging.
Especially sun protection. Some scholars estimate that 70% of skin aging comes from ultraviolet rays, that is to say, if you really exclude the influence of ultraviolet rays on your skin, your skin at the age of 40 will not look much different from that at the age of 20.
Although this is an estimated situation, it is recognized that sun protection is the biggest influencing factor of skin aging. Therefore, when you have a choice, you must give priority to sun protection. I don't care whether you wear sunscreen, an umbrella, sunglasses, stay indoors, or just cover your face with sheets when you go out.
Anti-free radical has higher priority than anti-saccharification.
Because free radicals are related to sun protection on the one hand and saccharification on the other, you should pay attention to how to protect your skin.
Another point is that oxygen free radicals are behind almost all skin-related aging processes. Among the various causes of skin aging, although on the surface it may be sun protection, smoking, diet and so on. It is very likely that oxygen free radicals are the last to exercise destructive behavior.
Moreover, anti-free radicals will also prevent the saccharification process to some extent.