Secondly, in terms of value orientation, both Laozi and Zhouyi think that everything in the world is in an endless change, but Laozi thinks that "if you want to change, why should you change", while Yi Zhuan thinks that "only change is bound to change"? What do you mean? Yi Zhuan is facing the globalization of the universe and the significance of changes in the universe, and Lao Tzu is right. According to Yi Zhuan, the expansion of the universe is a process of continuous enrichment and growth from the origin of everything, which is commendable. And Lao Tzu also thinks that this is a process that is constantly plagued by contradictions and opposites, dismembered and degraded, so Lao Tzu gives priority to returning to the truth and singleness. Different theoretical bases have different value orientations. The only certainty is that the Book of Changes adopted some viewpoints of Laozi in the process of interpreting the Book of Changes. The only thing that can directly connect Taoism with Zhouyi is metaphysics in Wei and Jin Dynasties. During the Wei and Jin Dynasties, Laozi, Zhuangzi and Zhouyi were collectively called San Xuan. I don't know much about how scholars in Wei and Jin Dynasties chose Zhouyi. The only thing that is clear is the Book of Changes written by Wang Bi, whose value orientation is inconsistent with the Book of Changes and the Book of Changes. In addition to Taoism, Ye Fan said that it "takes Yin and Yang as its home", indicating that it has nothing to do with Zhouyi.