1, if the paper duplicate checking system is a service, then the paper can be understood as a unique product of the academic, and the seriousness of the academic itself is even more difficult to imitate and replace. Then there is a high demand for the assurance of leakage, regardless of subjective malicious leakage (this situation is extremely rare, so all platforms can't predict it), and then it is necessary to see whether there is a duplicate check report from a technical point of view: moreover, the time limit of the duplicate check report is clear, and the duplicate check report will only be kept for a short time after the safety duplicate check system is tested, and the outdated system will be automatically removed.
2. accuracy. Although the database of each duplicate checking system is different, the selection should also be based on whether the database of the duplicate checking system meets the basic requirements, that is, whether it contains several mainstream data, so that the test results have reference value. If the duplicate checking result of a system is too outrageous, it will eventually waste us a lot of time and may directly affect graduation. So this is very important. It can be seen from the repeated sources in the duplicate checking report.
3, high cost performance. For example, the authority of HowNet is very high. Although the personal version has been launched, it is not comprehensive. Not all paper can be used. Only through other channels, the price is very high. Therefore, there are some duplicate checking platforms on the market, including tadpoles, which can be relatively affordable, even free or partially free.
Over!