There are generally five ways to put forward the central argument:

First, the title of the article itself is a clear judgment, which is the central argument of the full text. The theme of an article is often either an argument or a topic. If it is a topic, find out the sentences that can have a clear view of the problems involved in the topic.

Second, the article puts forward a central argument from the beginning, which is the so-called straight-to-the-point writing method.

Third, summarize the full text, point to the end of the article and reveal the discussion center.

Fourth, put forward a general argument in the middle of the article.

Fifth, the sentences that did not clearly express the argument in the original text were summed up by the readers themselves (a few argumentative papers).

Step 2 argue

Factual arguments: including representative and conclusive cases, historical facts and statistical data. (matter)

Rationality argument: refers to incisive theories, famous sayings and aphorisms, folk proverbs and recognized facts, principles and laws that have been tested by practice. (quote)

Exception: There is something in the example. What did someone say?

This depends on whether this sentence is useful. If it is to prove the argument directly, it is a reasonable argument.

If it shows some function in the event, that is, it serves the event, it is part of the factual argument.

3. Demonstration process:

Tip: What arguments are used, what arguments are conveyed, and what points are proved?

Format: Take … as an example to prove … (factual argument)

Cite ... to prove ... (argument)

Can not be ignored: if there are comparative arguments and figurative arguments in the process of argumentation, they should also be mentioned in the process of argumentation. Finally, write it out to prove the central argument.

For example, first of all, the example (quotation) proves the point of view ... from the front, then the quotation proves the point of view ... from the back, through comparative argument, and finally through metaphorical argument, thus proving the central argument.

4. From what angle (aspect) did you prove the author's point of view?

If it is several paragraphs, summarize the center of each paragraph separately.

If it is a paragraph, it depends on how many layers it can be divided into and what is the center of each layer.

The center of each paragraph or layer is the aspect or angle of the author's argument.

5, combined with the content of the article, contact the actual life, talk about feelings.

Key points: the content of the article, the reality of life and your own feelings are indispensable.

Tip: As the article says (the central argument of the article or the sentence I feel the most)

+In life (an instance or phenomenon in life)

+I think (my own views on the above two points)

6. Forgery questions: (There can be three styles, not only in argumentative essays, but also in this senior high school entrance examination)

Steps: 1) Read the forged materials and analyze the forged joints in combination with the original text (i.e. related contents).

2) Analyze the relationship between forged materials and the original text.

contrast

analogy

3) Analyze the influence of forged materials on the original text.

A deepen the understanding of the original content

B. Expansion and extension of the original content

4) Review the topic requirements. If there are several materials, summarize * * * from them, or choose one. When answering questions, you should not only mention the original text, but also consider the contents of forged materials and talk about your feelings. And pay attention to the word count requirements.