1. Evaluation of the theme and research background of the paper: The reviewers will evaluate the theme and research background of the paper to determine whether it has certain theoretical significance and practical value.

2. Evaluation of the structure and logic of the paper: The reviewer will evaluate the overall structure, chapter arrangement and argumentation logic of the paper to ensure that the paper is clear and coherent.

3. Evaluation of paper methods and data: The reviewers will analyze the research methods, data sources and data processing adopted in the paper to evaluate its scientificity and feasibility.

4. Evaluation of the opinions and conclusions of the paper: The reviewer will evaluate the main opinions, arguments and conclusions of the paper to judge whether it is innovative and convincing.

5. Evaluation of paper writing and expression: The reviewers will evaluate the language expression, format specification and cited documents of the paper to ensure that the paper conforms to academic norms.

6. Point out the problems and deficiencies in the paper: The reviewers will put forward specific opinions and suggestions to help the author improve the paper.

7. Evaluation of the overall quality of the paper: The reviewers will comprehensively evaluate the overall quality of the paper and give corresponding grades or scores.

8. Other supplementary opinions: The reviewer may put forward other supplementary opinions and suggestions according to the specific conditions of the paper.

In a word, the comprehensive evaluation opinion of the paper aims at comprehensively and objectively evaluating the quality and level of the paper and providing the direction for the author to improve and perfect the paper.