Personally, I think that the military attache here emphasizes force, that is, courage and resourcefulness, while the civilian emphasizes strategy, that is, playing tricks. How can a well-developed and foolhardy military attache fight with a civilian full of ideas and rain? This should be the main meaning here.

There is also a military attache who is difficult to manage, because his personality is stubborn and he begins to rebel. Unlike civil servants, they pursue the prosperity of their official career. As long as the position is right and the treatment is right, they rarely make trouble. Of course, they are talking about peacetime.

Governing the country by words does not require force. As the saying goes, words must be kept, and actions must be fruitful.

Hope to adopt. Thank you.