Because all academic journals, whether core journals or general journals, have the final review by the editor-in-chief, that is, before publication, the editor of the magazine will typeset the articles, then print them into small samples and submit them to the editor-in-chief or editorial board for final review. This link is really likely to be rejected! ! ! Even if the preliminary review and review are conducted according to the final review, if the editor-in-chief of the article thinks it is unlikely, the manuscript will still be rejected.

Give a few real cases

The proof of 1.X journal was sent to the author for inspection, and then the editor-in-chief asked for review and rejection after inspection, because some details were not well written.

2. I also checked the proof of "X-word culture". If the editor-in-chief thinks that it doesn't conform to the theme of the manuscript, he will directly reject the manuscript and refuse to modify it.

3. The editorial team of XX Science Forum was changed, and all articles received before were directly rejected. The editor-in-chief team and the editor-in-chief team struggled for three months, and finally took a step back, returned some bad articles and published them.

Therefore, don't think that the final version can be published after employment. This is a wrong idea and a wrong understanding of inexperienced people. Periodicals are not a commodity business. They will be published when they are approved for publication. Before publication, there were many unexpected factors, such as the sudden rectification of HowNet.