(a) follow the relevant principles and provisions of the "Regulations on Academic Degrees in People's Republic of China (PRC)";

(two) is conducive to objectively reflect the real situation of the quality of graduate education in each degree point;

(three) to strengthen the construction of degree programs, establish and improve the quality assurance and supervision mechanism of postgraduate education;

(four) focused, simple.

Second, the object of blind trial

The object of blind examination of thesis is the full-time graduate students who were preparing for thesis defense in our school.

Third, the blind trial method.

1. Postgraduates who participated in the double-blind review: doctoral students 100%, with three copies each. Master students (including those applying for equivalent academic degrees) shall be submitted in duplicate for preliminary examination according to 3 ~ 5% of the number of respondents who applied for dissertation in that year.

2. According to the distribution of disciplines and professional graduate students who apply for dissertation defense every year, graduate department formulates a blind test plan and submits it to the principal in charge for approval.

3. According to the blind trial plan, graduate department draws up the list of graduate students who need to be blind-audited, and after checking with the list of graduate students who apply for thesis defense, informs me and the college to which the subject belongs to be blind-audited.

4. Graduate students who have been drawn out to participate in the blind test should make a paper in the prescribed format (the name of the author and tutor is hidden) within two days after receiving the notice, with master's thesis in duplicate and doctoral thesis in triplicate, and submit it to the Graduate Office.

Four, blind trial work requirements

(a) blind reviewers are all borne by peer experts outside the school, and graduate department is responsible for extracting them from the expert database.

(2) In order to ensure the normal work of blind inspection of dissertations, all master students who apply for dissertation defense must submit their dissertations 30 days in advance, and doctoral students 45 days in advance (except in winter and summer vacations).

(three) to participate in the blind examination of papers, it is necessary to organize the defense work after the results of the blind examination are determined, and the results of the blind examination should be used as the basis for the qualification of defense and the evaluation of papers.

(four) review papers are generally not returned.

Four, blind trial results processing

(1) The opinions of papers submitted for review are all withdrawn, and the review opinions are valid. If full recovery is not possible, the lost copy must be submitted for review.

(II) Due to special circumstances, if it is not possible to withdraw all the papers submitted in time, graduate department can decide whether to let the graduate students defend their papers first according to the withdrawn evaluation opinions, and then determine the handling opinions of the defense according to the number of empty albums recovered and the evaluation opinions.

(3) If one vote is rejected in the double-blind evaluation of doctoral dissertations, two reviewers will be added for a second interview; If negative opinions appear again, the paper will be judged as unqualified. If two votes are rejected, the paper will be judged unqualified. The master's degree thesis is subject to blind examination and one-vote veto system.

(4) graduate department informed the degree evaluation sub-committee, tutors and graduate students to defend their papers. If the thesis is considered unqualified, the graduate department will inform the graduate students and their tutors to revise the thesis; If the graduate students themselves and their tutors disagree with the results of the blind test, they can fill in the Application Form for Review and apply for a review.

(5) After receiving the Application Form for Review, the Sub-committee on Responsibility Assessment shall organize relevant experts or members of the Sub-committee to comment on the dissertations and blind evaluation opinions that have been blindly rated as unqualified. If you agree with the results of blind evaluation, you should instruct the instructor to guide the graduate students to carefully revise their dissertations within the prescribed time limit. The blind trial fee shall be borne by the tutor or graduate student.

(6) The revision period for the dissertations that fail the blind evaluation shall not exceed two years for doctors and one year for masters. The revised dissertation still needs to participate in double-blind review, and in principle, it will be re-reviewed by the original reviewer. If the paper is rejected again, the author's degree application qualification will be cancelled.

(7) Where the graduate dissertations brought by tutors are blindly rated as unqualified dissertations, they must participate in the next round of double-blind evaluation or appraisal at their own expense, and at the same time increase the proportion of double-blind evaluation in their disciplines.

(eight) if there are two graduate tutors (different sessions)

If there are unqualified dissertations in blind inspection, enrollment will be restricted within two years. If two people in a session are blindly examined as unqualified papers, their tutor qualifications will be cancelled.

(9) If two graduate students in two disciplines are blindly judged as unqualified dissertations, the discipline shall give a warning, rectify and reduce the enrollment plan.

Five, about the review method of classified papers

(1) Confirmation of confidential documents

1. Dissertations related to classified scientific research projects confirmed by the science and technology industry department of our university;

2. Although the work of the thesis does not involve confidential scientific research projects, some contents are not suitable for public disclosure: it is applied by the tutor, agreed by the person in charge of the degree sub-committee, and approved by the chairman of the university degree committee.

(1) Review confidential documents

Papers identified as confidential are not subject to blind inspection, but need to be publicly reviewed. According to the confidentiality of the paper, experts inside and outside the school can be invited for public review.

Six, the rules from the fall of 2006 graduate students began to implement, by graduate department is responsible for the interpretation of.