The quality of SCI papers will determine the fate of their publication, whether they are included or rejected. But how to judge the quality of an SCI paper? In fact, the quality of an SCI paper can be divided into five grades, and these five grades also determine whether the probability of successful publication is high or low.
The first level: simple repetition
Simply repeating other people's research topics without new methods and viewpoints. Papers of this level are the worst and basically difficult to publish, so if the author knows the quality of such papers, it is recommended to rewrite or make in-depth revisions.
Level 2: No new findings.
(1) General clinical, experimental or on-site observation and analysis have not found any new laws or new opinions.
(2) the introduction of general technology, no important improvement.
This kind of paper is only a simple clinical experiment, without in-depth analysis or exploration, so no new findings or insights can be obtained. For the revision of this kind of paper, it is suggested to explore the experimental research in depth, improve the imported technology appropriately, and then repeat the experiment.
The third layer: unconfirmed theory.
(1) Prove the theory implied by others with completely reliable facts, but it has not been completely proved.
(2) Introduce foreign advanced technology to fill the domestic gap, but there is no important improvement.
This level of paper has been able to fully discuss the content of the paper, but it can't demonstrate the theme of the paper, that is, the content quoted or discussed can't demonstrate the theme of the paper, so the materials or skills used are meaningless. It is suggested to delete these useless parts and find better discussion content to demonstrate the theme of the paper.
Level 4: No breakthrough.
(1) adds new contents to the original theory (but there is no major key breakthrough).
(2) Supplementing or correcting the laws or phenomena discovered by predecessors will play a certain role in the development and correction of related theories.
(3) Technological invention or introduction of foreign advanced technology or self-design or manufacture with reference to its principles make it difficult to fill domestic gaps (technologies or achievements) in customer service.
(4) Put forward new guiding ideology and methods, so as to obviously improve the clinical curative effect and reach the domestic advanced level.
A paper of this level is actually a good paper. Papers and periodicals to be published in China should also be included, but those with high scores, especially foreign SCI papers and periodicals, are beyond my power. Without a key breakthrough, the innovation of the paper will be insufficient, and the key technologies or theories supporting the paper need to be discussed and discussed in depth.
Level 5: The most suitable SCI papers for publication.
(1) put forward a new viewpoint with great influence in theory, which was affirmed and praised by academic circles at home and abroad.
(2) discover important laws or new phenomena with regularity that have not been discovered before.
(3) There is sufficient factual basis to overthrow the accepted old theory.
(4) there is a major invention in technology, a key improvement on the imported foreign advanced technology, and it has reached the international advanced level through practice.
(5) Put forward new guiding ideology and methods to make a breakthrough in improving clinical efficacy and reach the international advanced level.
The last level of the paper is the basic requirement for a high-quality paper. As long as these contents are met, domestic journals and SCI papers will be included.