Let's take a look at similar problems that have been tested over the years:
Example 1 according to the underlined part in material 5? Don't be complicated when it's simple, and don't be simple when it's complicated: only simple and complicated can achieve efficiency and effect? Write an article. (40 points)
Requirements: choose your own angle and have a clear thinking; Connect with reality, not stick to reality? Given information? ; Clear thinking and fluent language; The total number of words is 1000? 1200 words. (entrance examination in April 20 18)
Example 2 Question 4:? Given data 5? Mentioned in? By who? Four vertical and four horizontal? Arrive? Eight vertical and eight horizontal? It reflects that China high-speed railway is moving from partial coverage to overall coverage. Please combine all the information with the actual situation? Try to talk? The whole? With what? Part of it is to write an article on the topic. (40 points)
Requirements: (1) Choose your own angle and think clearly; (2) Connecting with reality and not sticking to reality? Given information? ; (3) clear thinking and fluent language; (4) About 1000- 1200 words.
Example 3 Combining the given materials, around? Standardization and personalization? Write an article on this topic. (40 points)
Requirements: seek truth from facts, clear and correct views, in-depth and reasonable analysis, fluent language, and control the number of words at 800? 1000 words.
Example 4? Given data 5? Mention? Change is absolute, invariance is relative, and unity is in the historical process of rural development? Please think deeply about this sentence, choose your own angle, connect with reality, write your own topic and write an article. (40 points)
Requirements: (1) Clear views and profound insights; (2) Reference? Given information? , but not rigidly adhere to? Given information? ; (3) clear thinking and fluent language; (4) The word number is 1000- 1200.
Example 5? Given data 6? Did you mention Lao Tzu? what's up And then what? Nothing? Point of view, please aim at the problems in the concept of urban construction reflected by the given information, and contact the reality? Try to talk? what's up With what? Write an article for nothing. (40 points)
Requirements: (1) Choose your own perspective and have profound insights; (2) Reference? Given information? , but not rigidly adhere to? Given information? ; (3) clear thinking and fluent language; (4) The total number of words is about 1000.
Please combine the information given, from the perspective of grassroots civil servants? Long skill, difficult task? Write an article on the main topic and write your own topic. (50 points)
Requirements: (1) Connect with reality, and don't stick to it? Given information? ; (2) Clear conception, clear thinking and fluent language; (3) The total number of words is 1000 ~ 1200.
First analyze these four questions. The two key words mentioned in Example 1 are simplicity and complexity, the whole and part mentioned in Example 2, the standardization and individualization mentioned in Example 3, the improvement of change and invariance mentioned in Example 4, and the development around the historical process of rural development. Example 5 refers to the existence of problems in the concept of urban construction, and Example 6 refers to long skills and difficulties from the perspective of grassroots civil servants. Then, in the process of writing such questions, we should pay special attention to the central argument and the sub-argument. You can't just say one of them, and you can't start from the title or material of the topic. For example, in Example 5, you can't just write the central argument? what's up , also can't just write? Nothing? It is necessary to reflect on and focus on the problems in the concept of urban construction.
So we have the following summary:
Argumentative essay on the relationship between Party A and Party B;
Central argument: A and B are in parallel and dialectical unity. Only by maintaining their balance can there be a surface, a thickness and a temperature.
The content of the ellipsis part can focus on the stem or material, for example, Example 5. what's up With what? Nothing? It goes hand in hand with dialectical unity. Only by maintaining the balance between the two can urban construction have both face and lining, both thickness and temperature. Another example is Example 4. Change? With what? The same? It is a dialectical unity. Only by maintaining the balance between the two can rural development have both face and lining, both thickness and temperature.
The first set of arguments:
1.a；
2.b；
3.A+B .
The second part demonstrates:
1.a is the basic/fundamental/necessary condition of b;
2.b is the result/extension/expression of a;
3.A+B .
The three sub-arguments in the first group are easier to develop when writing. The first and second sub-arguments can be directly written as A and B, and the connotations and meanings of A and B can be written. The third argument describes the relationship between A and B. For example, A and B seem to be contradictory, but in fact they are dialectical unity.
The three arguments in the second group are slightly more difficult to write than those in the first group. The first point and the second point should be clear about the relationship between A and B, and the third point is that both A and B are needed for a certain topic.
Of course, there are also special circumstances, such as long skills and difficulty mentioned in Example 6. From the perspective of grass-roots civil servants, it is not difficult to find that long skills and difficulties are not contradictory, but complementary and indispensable. So pay special attention when writing the relationship between the two.