Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Master's requirements for national defense experts
Master's requirements for national defense experts
The members of the Master's Defense Committee are required to be composed of 3 to 5 experts who are associate professors (or equivalent professional and technical positions) or have the qualifications of master's tutors. ?

1, master thesis defense expert.

The master thesis defense committee shall be composed of at least three associate professors (or equivalent professional and technical positions), and the chairman must be a master tutor with senior titles, including at least? 1 off-campus experts.

2. The number of members of the National Defense Commission shall be odd.

Among the members of the defense committee, there are not less than 2 tutors for master students and not less than 3 tutors with the same academic qualifications, and the applicant's tutor shall not be a member of the defense committee. The maximum number of members of the defense committee and reviewers of papers is 1.

3. A national defense commission composed of three members.

The resolution must be adopted by all members, and the resolution of the defense Committee composed of more than three members must be adopted by more than two thirds (excluding two thirds).

4. Secretary for the defense of master's thesis.

The defense secretary of master students must be an on-the-job teacher. Please send your opinions to the defense committee 10 days before the defense. The names and opinions of the examiners shall be kept confidential to the applicant.

The main achievements and innovative evaluation requirements of the defense experts on the thesis work;

1. Make an accurate evaluation of the scientific significance and potential application prospect of this research work.

2. Make an accurate evaluation of whether the respondent fully grasps the relevant domestic and foreign literature in his research field, as well as the induction and arrangement of relevant frontier academic ideas and viewpoints in the paper.

3. Explain the main innovative contents and methods of the paper (generally no more than 3 points), and express its innovative views and conclusions.

4. Evaluate whether the structure, logic, writing style, data possession and writing of the thesis are standardized, and explain whether it has reached the academic level of the corresponding degree thesis. We must point out the shortcomings and problems in the early stage of thesis and defense, or put forward the direction of further research.