This indicator is only a "suspected" sign of the duplicate checking system of HowNet, and it is not the final conclusion. Therefore, the school does not take these indicators as assessment criteria, rest assured. China HowNet defines several indicators as follows:

1. Those who directly or indirectly use arguments, viewpoints and conclusions in other people's publicly published documents without quotation marks can be regarded as "plagiarism";

2. The direct or indirect use of written expression in other people's published documents without quotation can be regarded as "plagiarism of written expression";

3. It may be considered as "repeated publication" to use the contents of my published literature (or I am one of the authors) in the paper without explanation or quotation, or to list the published literature in general in the references after the article.

The latest version of the duplicate checking report of HowNet sets the first proportion as "excluding the copy proportion of my published documents", and the school takes this result as a reference value.