Zhang Wenhong's alleged plagiarism of Dr. Zhang Wenhong's paper caused a heated discussion. This incident originated from a netizen named "Sheng Da said". This netizen posted at noon on August 14 that Zhang Wenhong's doctoral thesis written in 2000 was suspected of plagiarizing the article "Molecular Biology and Isoniazid Resistance of KatG Gene of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis" written by Huang Hainan, which was suspected of "academic fraud".
As soon as the news came out, the voice calling for investigation by relevant departments continued to expand. The Graduate School of Fudan University issued the Response to the Report about Dr. Zhang Wenhong's Study on Biting in Our School. In this regard, Fudan University received relevant reports, and also paid attention to some questions about the abstract of Dr. Zhang Wenhong's doctoral thesis reflected on the Internet. The school has started investigation and verification, and the results will be announced in time.
Did Zhang Wenhong really copy it? After the incident came out, many people were puzzled. How did a paper with such a high weight pass the exam in the first place? Was there no duplicate checking system in 2000? In fact, this matter is easy to understand. First of all, Dr. Zhang's article was published in 2000, that is, 2 1 year ago. The last check should not be as strict as it is now.
Furthermore, it seems that the actual "summary" content of dr. zhang's alleged plagiarism was not standardized in 2000, which is why this happened. Some netizens pointed out that if what Zhang Wenhong was accused of plagiarizing is the content of the text, then there is no problem with such a question. However, the abstract part is actually equivalent to summary and quotation, and this part does not actually involve any "scientific research achievements", so many professors did not pay attention to this part of the review when reviewing papers in the past.
After the review of the paper, everyone paid attention to other parts except the main body, and now even the summary part is not allowed to be copied. Is it too harsh to ask for a paper 2 1 year ago? Moreover, dr. zhang's whole paper has more than 70,000 words, which is about 3,300 words less than the content accused of plagiarism. Actually, it only accounts for about 4%.
Furthermore, Professor Huang has a full text of more than 3,700 words, with 9 references at the end. To sum up, the author thinks that Professor Zhang didn't plagiarize, and of course the final judgment should be handed over to Fudan Graduate School. Now that Fudan University has responded, we just need to wait for the results of the investigation. As for now, we should not jump to conclusions about dr. zhang.
There are no perfect people in the world, including Zhang Wenhong, and no exception. Because of this, we should judge a person not only by his words but also by his actions. When many people scold Zhang Wenhong with malicious words, they just want to give him a good scolding and then step on him. What is Zhang Wenhong doing? It is not difficult to see that the time has been pushed forward 10 day and 240 hours. He is still doing his duty as a doctor, outpatient service, ward round and operation, as always;
He is still doing his duty as an expert, telling Shanghai residents what to do with the gentlest words; He is still sticking to the bottom line of a public figure, and silence is the channel for him to maintain his dignity. He was not disturbed by the abuse all over the sky. As always, he tells the truth and does practical things. Fortunately, there is Zhang Wenhong in Shanghai; Zhang Wenhong is also lucky to be in Shanghai.
Imperfect heroes should also be cherished. What is Zhang Wenhong's personality most recognized by netizens? But he always stands out from the epidemic; Because he has a deep understanding of his professional field, he can tell the public the key information very succinctly; But like everyone else, he wants the world to be a better place. But he always speaks bravely. If such people have to encounter cyber violence and be attacked for no reason, who will dare to do so in the future?