If the arguments and theorems of the paper are not strictly demonstrated logically and only rely on individual cases, then they will not rise to the height of theory, and it is difficult to be completely convinced. Insufficient arguments include insufficient arguments, poor arguments, contradictory arguments and weak logic.

1. Lack of arguments.

The so-called lack of arguments refers to the fact that a lot of truth is said in the analysis, which is also correct, but it lacks the necessary arguments to support it; Or a theorem or idea is put forward in the paper, which may be correct, but it is not strictly demonstrated.

2. The argument is not smooth.

The so-called argument is not smooth, which means that there are loopholes in the theoretical derivation or logical proof of graduation thesis, and the proof process jumps too much or is far-fetched, making the analysis and proof of the thesis nonsense, and even making the thesis a satirical article. If you make something out of nothing. If there is an unfounded reasoning method, it is inevitable to say fallacies.

3. The argument is opposite.

The so-called motivation contradiction means that the arguments and arguments in the paper are contradictory and cannot fully or partially prove the truth to be said. For example, a paper on calculation methods is said to be a summary of the professor's paper. When the numerical accuracy is calculated by the examples in this paper, the accuracy of the original method reaches 2%, while the accuracy of the new method only reaches 5%. In this way, the argument is the same as the paper. Is the new method better than the old one? Contradictions The way to correct this kind of problem is to correct the argument or change the argument.

4. The logic is not strong.

The so-called logic is not strong, that is, the graduation thesis only has materials without opinions, and the materials are piled up in a mess without order. Some students collected a lot of materials in the early stage, and when they wrote, they felt that these materials were very exciting, so they grabbed their beards and eyebrows. The result is that there are examples and illustrations everywhere, but there is no original point of view, which makes the paper a material library. The reason for this problem is the lack of sufficient analysis of the original material data and the lack of good logical arrangement of the writing outline of the paper. The improvement method is to pay attention to writing an outline.

The above is about the relevant sharing of graduation thesis argumentation. I hope it will help everyone. Want to know more, please pay attention to this platform in time!