* * * Enjoy a bicycle. Argument 1 * * * Enjoy a bicycle. Is it ruined? Just follow the police! It's not that simple: first, if you are caught destroying public facilities, you will be subject to administrative punishment, but if it involves criminal law, but * * * is not a public facility, and the ownership is clear. If you don't report it, you won't file a case, let alone punish it; Second, the operator can choose to report the case, but the value of the bicycle is low, which is not enough to constitute theft, and reporting the case is not necessarily the best choice; Third, the causes of man-made destruction are extremely complicated. Bicycle users are not necessarily saboteurs. "Capturing the responsible person alive" is tantamount to finding a needle in a haystack. To achieve a precise strike, the regulatory cost is too high.
If the management level is quite embarrassing, then it is basically impossible to hope for the treasure and use of bicycles. Although the behavior is ultimately manifested as destruction, the psychological incentives can be said to be various: some black cars think that bicycles are robbing business, some just don't like it, some people may just think it's fun, and some just take it out on them. For example, a man in Shanghai threw three mobike cars into the Huangpu River. The reason of the parties is that there is a chip in the car, which is not safe. Guangzhou has an example of throwing a car into the Pearl River on the grounds of fun after drinking; Others want to keep bicycles for themselves, and even put needles in their seats ... all these things are even more difficult to supervise.
In this regard, "quality theory" is a common summary, but quality is too abstract to grasp the substantive issues. What's the point? * * * Enjoy the cycling mode. Although it is called "* * * enjoyment", it is a leasing economy characterized by the separation of users and owners. Several situations should be distinguished: 1. If you are the owner, it is difficult for you to punch and kick your car; 2. If you take a special bus and the driver treats you as the owner, you may not be able to get up and destroy it; But if you just rent a bicycle and the owner doesn't stare at you at all, what reason do you have to cherish it? It can be seen that the separation of bicycle property rights and responsibilities has led to many people's hostility to it.
In this case, it is good to prescribe the right medicine, and the prescription is to make more efforts in research and development and design. The example of mobike is very representative. To design the product to "prevent all accidents", the QR code is specially designed and cannot be scratched; If the tire is solid, it can't be punctured; Extremely simplified design, a part can not be removed; This car is too heavy to sell. In addition to the value, the cost of a generation of mobike also reached 6000 yuan. Do you dare to break the filing standard for such a car? Of course! Shanghai has a precedent. A citizen who thought mobike was "superior" moved and was sentenced to three months in prison.
Similarly, * * * enjoys bicycle driving and parking in violation of regulations. Many people feel that they can stop wherever they want and want to run a red light. The reason is too clear-they are not responsible for these actions! Therefore, to solve the problems of illegal parking and illegal driving, it is also necessary to formulate targeted policies. The general principle is to clarify the responsibility to the lessor. How to make it clear? The key is the platform. By designing credit sub-rules and reporting mechanism, we can record the credit status of the lessee and punish those who don't follow the rules. In this way, grasping the main framework of bicycle research and development and rule design will effectively reduce the bicycle damage rate.
From the above, bicycle damage behavior involves at least three levels: at the use level, most people are not careful enough; At the governance level, its supervision cost is very high; At the design level, it gives the saboteur an opportunity. Therefore, the management of chaos requires a trinity: on the issue of use, it is clear to hand over the responsibility to the users and standardize the use; On the issue of governance, report some representative destructive behaviors as examples; More importantly, efforts should be made to eliminate potential problems in R&D and design.
* * * Reflections on Bicycle Enjoyment Part II Recently, a large number of bicycles were damaged at the entrance and exit of Xiashan Park in Shekou Bay, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province. Hundreds of bicycles of several brands are piled up into two "hills", and many bicycle handlebars, baskets and other parts are scattered around the ground, which is a mess.
Seeing such news, people who are enjoying the convenience of * * * will naturally think of management problems. However, the object of playing the board is public management or enterprise management of its own resources?
Faced with a mountain of bicycles, enterprises engaged in this field are obviously unable to escape responsibility. * * * Bicycle enjoyment, as an enterprise's own resource, needs to be well managed. Even enterprises that flaunt the Internet and big data, their technology and means are to improve management services, otherwise it is a funny fantasy to seek their own value and interests in the so-called public convenience.
But it should also be said that on this issue, it is difficult to completely separate the poor management of enterprises from the absence of public management. Just like the mobile vendors in those days, since * * * likes to ride bicycles in the street, it has encountered various management difficulties. For example, the vehicle was maliciously damaged, and the QR code on the car body was labeled with psoriasis advertisement. Earlier, the media reported that the urban management in Chengdu, Sichuan Province simply confiscated hundreds of bicycles at one time on the grounds of "illegally occupying the road".
Based on the contradiction between convenience and order, it seems reasonable for people to reflect on public management with the help of a mountain of bicycles. However, whether it is an enterprise that provides * * * bicycles, an individual who participates in * * * bicycles, or a government agency that provides public * * * services, the field of reflection is still on that street bicycle that helps solve urban traffic problems. Enterprises believe that as long as bicycles are put on the market, the purpose of * * * * will be achieved; Consumers think that as long as they can ride bicycles, it doesn't matter how the next person uses them; The government believes that as long as the bicycles that occupy the road are put away, urban management will be realized.
But is this the economy we want to enjoy? We reflect on the management of * * * to enjoy cycling, isn't it to make * * * enjoy the economy with a benign soil environment? What do we like? Is it a kind of thinking, a kind of thinking that can fundamentally reconstruct the relationship between people, a kind of thinking that enterprises, individuals and governments participate in social services?
If we admit that we enjoy not just a bicycle, but a kind of thinking of social operation, then we need to broaden our horizons of reflection and put it on the cornerstone of a healthy social operation-trust, rules and order. In this process, the relevant government departments should make scientific plans and introduce corresponding management systems; The market should use the mainstream way to promote good travel modes and realize healthy operation; Society should also actively participate, such as encouraging people who consciously maintain order by means of social credit points. Today, it is for * * * to spend some time enjoying cycling, so that more * * * economic products can land smoothly in the future.