Case 1: A foreign trade company in Henan received a single letter of credit of US$ 37,200.00 opened by a bank in the name of British Standard Mai Jia Libingham Branch (BIR Minghan Branch of Standard Chartered Bank Limited), and the notice was National Westminster Bank Ltd. London.

Because the letter of credit is not examined by the professionals of the local bank as usual, some suspicious situations have been found: (65438+ 0) the letter of credit format is outdated, there is no sender's address on the envelope, and the postmark is vague, so it is impossible to identify where to send it; (2) the National Westminster Bank negotiates in London, which is contrary to the convention; (3) the complete address of the bank is separated, where there is no yearbook; and (4) the letter of credit is signed. In view of the above situation, the bank initially determined that the card was a forged letter of credit, and after contacting the head office for verification, it filed a case. So as to avoid the fraud of forging documents.

Case 2: A bank in China received a confirmed letter of credit from the branch of Canadian AC Bank, the amount of which was about100,000 USD, and the beneficiary was an Anhui import and export company. The first trial of the bank card found that the card had the following doubts: (1) The confirmation of the grantor was not added to the card, and when the card was opened, it was indicated that "this card will be confirmed by a call from XX Bank"; (2) The validity card was installed on the same day, and it was less than one week after leaving the card; (3) The beneficiary is required to allow the shipment, and a copy of the original bill of lading and documents are sent to the applicant by DHL express as soon as possible; (4) For the license of the day, see 45 votes for payment, and it is stipulated that the beneficiary can get the annual interest of 1 1%. (5) The applicant of the letter of credit is in Canada and the consignee is in Singapore. (6) The telex to the license is abnormal. In response to these questions, on the one hand, Bank of China warned the company that "this kind of license is unsatisfactory in Miya, so please wait for shipment", on the other hand, it rushed to the international department of the head office and replied: "There is no such investigation company." Later, it received a confirmation letter signed by "Bank of America", but the content of the confirmation letter did not increase the burden. Later, the Bank of China's representative office of Bank of America asked it for help in verification, and the final answer was: "The bank has never issued a confirmation letter to Xinhua, and the card has not been opened with anyone." At this point, it is finally confirmed that this is the third case of bank theft and fraud in Miya.