1. Read the peer review opinions carefully: read the opinions and suggestions put forward by the reviewers carefully to understand their views and concerns. This can better respond to their criticism and modify the paper accordingly.
2. In-depth revision of the paper: according to the review comments, the paper is comprehensively revised and improved. Ensure that every problem is solved, and the revised paper is clearer, more accurate and more convincing.
3. Seek peer review: invite experts or peers from other fields to review the revised paper. They can provide new ideas and suggestions to help further improve the paper.
4. Reorganize the structure of the paper: Reorganize the structure of the paper according to the review comments to make it more coherent and easy to understand. Make sure that each part has a clear goal and logical order.
5. Supplementary experimental evidence: If the reviewers think that the experimental evidence is insufficient or insufficient, they can consider conducting more experiments or collecting more data to support the research results.
6. Cite relevant documents: In the revised paper, cite more relevant documents to support your own views and research results. This can increase the credibility and academic value of the paper.
7. Communicate with editors and reviewers: When replying to peer review opinions, communicate with editors and reviewers politely and patiently. Explain your revision intention, answer their questions and provide necessary supplementary materials.
8. Choose a suitable journal: If possible, consider contributing to a more suitable journal. Choosing journals related to the research field and with high admission rate can improve the probability of passing again.
9. Seek the help of professional editors: If conditions permit, you can seek the help of professional editors. They can help to modify the language expression, format and structure of papers and improve the quality of papers.
10. Don't give up and persist: The most important thing is not to give up and persist. Even if the paper is rejected, we should believe in our research value, continue to improve the paper and try to pass it again.
A. Evaluation conditions of subtropical high titles
The selection conditions for deputy senior titles are:
First, t