The refutation thesis is roughly divided into two parts, namely "refutation" and "establishment". On the basis of refuting the wrong views of the other party, establish your own correct views. "Refutation"? It is the premise of "standing", and the key point of refuting the other side is to seize the "breakthrough". Find the weak links in the other party's argument, argument or argumentation, reveal the fallacy, and then demonstrate. "Reason" is the natural result and inevitable requirement of "refutation". It can also be gradually formed in the process of refutation, but the argument must be clear.

There are three ways to refute the other side's point of view: -directly refute each other's arguments; The second is to refute each other's arguments by refuting each other's arguments; The third is to refute each other's arguments by refuting each other's arguments. The ultimate goal of all rebuttal methods is to refute the other party's argument. An article that exposes and refutes wrong views and propositions from a correct argument or under the guidance of a correct argument is called an argumentative essay. In argumentative writing, comments are the main body of the article.

There are three ways to refute each other's arguments:

(1) Refutation point. Among arguments, arguments and arguments, the error of arguments is the key, and arguments and arguments serve the wrong arguments. Refuting wrong arguments is the main refuting method in writing refuting papers.

(2)? Refute the evidence Wrong arguments are always supported by untenable or absurd theories and wrong examples. As long as these arguments are overturned and refuted, they will lose their support and be self-defeating.

(3)? Refute an argument Wrong arguments not only rely on absurd and untrue arguments, but also often use wrong arguments and reasoning between them to sophistry. Refuting arguments is to expose the unreasonable connection between wrong arguments and arguments, and point out the confusion and absurdity of their logical relationship.