For example, reading an argumentative essay depends first on whether the topic is a topic or an argument. For example, the topic "Leave some blank" is obviously a topic drawn up by metaphorical rhetoric. Therefore, the title of rhetorical devices cannot be used as the central argument.
The general argument adopts the affirmative sentence of "what is so-and-so". The topic of this second mock exam is "Reading is not just a matter of liberal arts", because it uses negative judgment sentences, so it is not an argumentative paper.
There are often two kinds of mistakes in finding arguments, that is, confusing the central argument with the sub-argument; Confuse the central argument with the final summary. To distinguish the central argument from the sub-argument, we should grasp that the sub-argument is a supplement to the central argument and not comprehensive. Distinguish between the central argument and the final summary. Pay attention to the summarized sentences and often talk about the significance and function of the argument.
2. To add a proper title to the argumentative paper, we must understand the content of the full text and set the topic in connection with the argument and topic.
Therefore, the suggested topic can be answered from two aspects: first, look at the topic of this article and use it as the title; Second, to see what the author holds, that is, what is the central argument, you can use the sentence that reveals the central argument as the title.
3. Summarize the meaning in parts as required, which requires an understanding of the author's writing ideas and argumentation ideas in order to give a good answer.
The examination of the argumentative essay structure in senior high school entrance examination is mainly the division of the full-text structure and the hierarchy of key paragraphs. The division of structural levels should start with the content of the article and see how it puts forward arguments and demonstrates them.
Mainly look at the theme of the article, if the content of the central part is to put forward the argument first, then elaborate it from several aspects, and finally summarize it in the form of "general-sub-general"; First put forward the argument, and then demonstrate from several aspects that it is "general theory-sub-theory" type; This paper analyzes the problems to be discussed from several aspects, and then draws the conclusion that it is "divided theory-general theory"
Put forward the argument first, then go deeper step by step and explain it layer by layer.
At the same time, we should also pay attention to the key words in the article, such as transitional paragraphs, transitional sentences and transitional words, which play a connecting role. If there are "and" and ",these words are juxtaposed; If there are words such as "not only, but also", "first" and "second", it is hierarchical.
4. To find out the sentences of a certain argument method and explain its function, we need to analyze them on the basis of understanding the argument method, and the analysis must combine the argument with the content.
You can use the following sentence patterns when doing the questions:
Such as: concrete argument+vivid image+argument combined with content.
Demonstration with examples+conclusive, sufficient and representative evidence+demonstration combined with arguments and contents.
5. Summary of demonstration materials. First, pay attention to the central sentence of the paragraph, especially the first enclosed sentence or summary sentence; Secondly, grasp the narrative elements such as characters and events, and then compress them in concise language according to the formula of "people (things)+the result of occurrence and development".
6. For prose-style argumentative essays, the language is implicit, and the understanding or meaning of certain sentences is examined. Be sure to sort out the arguments of this article, the author's ideas and the purpose of writing, so that things will be easy. The following formula can be used: rhetoric+the relationship between this sentence and the argument.
7. When you are asked to add an argument, you must pay attention to generalities and have the shadow of the argument between the lines to serve the argument. Reasoning argument and fact argument are two basic forms of argument. Factual arguments refer to representative and conclusive cases, historical facts and statistical data. Rational argument refers to the theories of revolutionary instructors, speeches of celebrities, theorems in scientific fields and common sense in life. After practice, its correctness has been recognized by people.
When reading an argumentative essay, we should first analyze the facts provided by the author, see the truth from the facts, and then check whether it is logically consistent with the argument of the article.
Doing this kind of questions can accumulate some typical examples and common sayings of celebrities such as reading, diligence, happiness, ideal and time.
8. Some paragraphs can be transposed. The relationship between paragraphs can be investigated from the following two aspects: either taking care of the previous paragraphs; Or logical order (progressive, turning, causal, from phenomenon to essence). Generally, there is no problem with this application.
9. Words are accurate, rigorous and logical.
The language of argumentative writing is rather general, and abstract words are often used to express rich content. The language of argumentative writing is still very rigorous and thoughtful, and it is often impeccable. When reading argumentative essays, we should grasp the key words in these key sentences and ponder over them repeatedly. A good argumentative essay can not only convince people with reason, but also affect people with emotion, and has a strong emotional color.
Our common question is whether a word can be deleted. We can adopt the following modes: can't+the word plays the role of modification and restriction+the meaning of the word in the text (retaining arguments and sub-arguments)+the consequences of deletion+accuracy and thoroughness (strong logic and vivid image).
10. When you meet other subjective questions, you should answer them as required and try to figure out the author's intention.
In short, the general steps of reading an argumentative essay can be summarized as follows: understanding its style from the questions-perceiving the content of the article as a whole-deeply understanding it with stylistic knowledge-sorting out the author's thoughts, centers and thoughts and feelings-answering questions.
If you follow the above method, you will lose less points, but this is not everything. You need to think more and feel more in your usual study.