First of all, the topic selection direction of the paper should be consistent with the author's own research and development direction; Secondly, the arguments and arguments of the paper should be sufficient, conform to the laws of objective facts, and can better explain and support a specific research achievement in the research field; In addition, the content of the paper should be innovative, practical and even theoretically instructive. The author thinks that we can analyze the three auditing standards for the successful publication of papers from the following three aspects.

First, the direction of topic selection should be consistent with the author's own research and development direction.

First of all, whether it is for college students' papers or for employees in certain research fields in some state institutions and large private enterprises, the first thing a paper writer should do is to choose a topic. After all, the topic selection direction of the paper needs to be consistent with the research direction of the author's field. The main purpose is to let the author give full play to his expertise in the research field, help more people who are confused about some specific problems in this field, or promote or even break through some key and difficult problems in this research and development field.

Second, the arguments and arguments of the paper should be sufficient, conform to the laws of objective facts, and conform to the specific research results that explain and support the development direction of the research field.

Secondly, for the author of the thesis, after the first step of writing the thesis, it is necessary to organize a summary of the specific research work done in this specific field in the early stage through the determined research direction of the topic. And use one's own language organization ability appropriately, and explain some social phenomena, corresponding research results and dialectical arguments reflected by problems in this research field with arguments that conform to the laws of objective facts. In the content of the paper, we should actively throw out research arguments, use arguments to assist interpretation, and at the same time support the authority or authenticity of research results in the corresponding fields.

Thirdly, the content of the paper should be innovative, practical and theoretically instructive.

Furthermore, for the author of the paper, the main content of the paper and some extended research thinking content should fully reflect the main thinking mode, research results and arguments of actively throwing out research questions, supplemented by arguments. The research results of this paper should conform to certain social innovation and practical value, and even have some cutting-edge theoretical guiding significance. After all, the research results of this paper are used in practice, benefit the society, promote social development and progress, and even lead the frontier development direction of a specific field in the future.

Note: The review criteria of the paper are not limited to the above three aspects, but also related to the logical thinking of the paper content, the rigor and fluency of the statement of the problem description. Before writing, the author should refer to the specific writing rules of the corresponding college or enterprise to publish a reasonable paper, and should also consciously abide by the bad behavior habit of bidding farewell to cheating.