Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Answering skills and routines of argumentative writing in senior high school
Answering skills and routines of argumentative writing in senior high school
The skills and routines for answering argumentative questions are as follows:

First, skills.

⑴ Clear: There can be n sub-arguments (to supplement and prove the central argument).

(2) Methods:

① Find the position: such as title, beginning, middle and end.

(2) Analyze the arguments of the article (which can be used to test whether the expected arguments are appropriate).

(3) abstract method (only sub-argument, no central argument).

Analyze how the argument is put forward:

(1) Put facts, reason and summarize arguments;

② Cut to the chase and put forward the central argument;

(3) Propose topics according to the phenomena existing in life, and summarize the central arguments through analysis and discussion;

(4) Narrating the author's experience and summarizing the central argument;

⑤ The author puts forward questions from the story, then gradually analyzes and infers, and finally draws a conclusion and puts forward the central argument.

Second, the routine (with what proof).

The type of 1. parameter.

(1) factual arguments (summarize after giving examples, and summarize closely with the arguments);

(2) argument (quote famous words to analyze).

2 arguments should be true, reliable and typical (subject matter, country, ancient and modern, etc.). ).

(1) sorting (anaphora parameter).

(2)? Judge whether the argument can prove the argument.

(3)? Supplementary argument (proof argument)

3. Argument.

(1) model law (must be four words).

(1) argument (example method) fact argument narrative.

(2) Argument (citation and reasoning) Argument discussion.

(3) Comparative argument (itself can also be an example argument and a reason argument).

(4) Metaphor argumentation metaphor is a metaphor in expository writing and a metaphor in prose.

⑵ Analysis and demonstration process.

(1) How is the argument put forward?

(2) How the argument is proved (what truths and facts are used, and whether there are positive and negative analysis and reasoning).

(3) Contact the structure of the full text, whether there is an abstract.

(3) Integrity of the argument (A: Make the argument more comprehensive and complete to avoid misunderstanding).

(4) The function of analysis and argumentation: to prove the argument in this paragraph.