We believe that students must quote materials in argumentative writing, so as to better grasp the will of materials and reduce the risk of digression and digression; Only by analyzing the materials can we get the central argument and then discuss it around it. At the same time, for students who are not good at Chinese literacy, especially have a headache for composition, and often worry about how to make up 800 words, quoting and analyzing materials can occupy a certain space and solve the embarrassment that they have nothing to say and can't even make up 800 words.
There is an article in the national volume 20 13 called "faith is needed in the age of interest". The whole article has no references. The marking teacher is very controversial about whether this article is suspected of digression. Later, after the expert appraisal of the marking group, he thought that the central argument of this article, "Belief is needed in the age of interest", was in line with the meaning of the topic. The article was profound in meaning and rich in content, and finally got a high score. (See page 15 of "Excellent Composition Report of National College Entrance Examination in 20 13") But it should be noted that this article is only a special case, a case among hundreds of thousands of papers. Are you so lucky? It's basically impossible. Therefore, we believe that in writing, the given materials "must be used, not used, this is a principle, can not be changed." Especially in the college entrance examination marking site, the high-intensity labor of the marking teacher will inevitably lead to fatigue. If you are reading a paper in a state of fatigue, if you don't quote or use materials in your writing, it is easy to be judged as digression.
Second, cited materials often appear problems and grab points strategy
In the process of quoting materials, many students will have such and such problems. The most common problems are: (1) copying materials without emphasis; The description of the material is too brief to analyze and draw an opinion; Excessive expansion and interpretation of materials; If there are multiple materials, each material is quoted in detail, and the eyebrows and beards are grabbed, and there is no focus.