The employment probability of rejection is not generalized, it depends on many factors. First of all, retraction means that the article has not been completely rejected, but there is still a chance to meet the requirements of the magazine through revision. The rejection notice issued by the editor usually indicates that the research direction of the paper is recognized, so the author has a greater chance of being hired through revision. The quality of the paper, the degree of revision, the opinions of reviewers and editors, the theme of the paper and the research direction all have an important impact on employment opportunities. If the content of the paper is of high quality, clear logic and sufficient arguments, even if it needs to be revised, the chances of being hired will be greater. The scope of revision is large, involving changes in the structure and viewpoints of the paper, which may reduce the chances of being hired. If the reviewers and editors agree with the content and revision of the paper, the chances of being hired will be greater. In addition, repeated inspection is also a key step in the evaluation process. If a large number of contents are similar to other documents, the paper may be returned for revision. The employment probability of returned and revised papers is uncertain, but it usually has a greater probability. Generally speaking, the employment probability of rejection depends on the author's ability to take seriously the review comments and improve them, as well as the degree of revision of the paper by the author. If the author can effectively respond to the peer review comments and make reasonable revisions and improvements to the paper, the chances of being hired will greatly increase.