First, parallel writing.

Argument juxtaposition and argument juxtaposition, the former can better show the depth of speculation. The difference between them is that in the process of argumentation, there are obvious arguments, and the arguments prove a corresponding argument. All argument-type juxtaposition arguments are directly used to prove the central argument.

1. Argument-type juxtaposition: After the central argument is established, the central argument is logically or logically divided into several parallel sub-arguments, and then how to demonstrate the sub-arguments can be demonstrated by examples, causal analysis, hypothetical reasoning or metaphorical reasoning.

2. The juxtaposition of arguments: After establishing the central argument, we should first expand the association and find a suitable argument, and then consider how to deduce the topic through the analysis and discussion of the arguments.

Second, improve writing.

In argumentation thinking, from shallow to deep, step by step, step by step, this is the progressive structure. Its characteristic is that the order of each layer has strict requirements and cannot be changed at will.

There are two forms of progressive structure:

1, one form is that the argumentative essay adopts the idea of asking questions first, then analyzing and then solving, which embodies the characteristics of hierarchical structure;

2. Another form is that the relationship between sub-arguments is progressive, and the level of argumentation is developed in depth, and the connotation of the topic is deeply prompted one by one, so that the central arguments are elaborated in depth, and their order is generally not interchangeable. It means layer after layer.

Examples of argumentative essays:

Example 1: Based on the argument that "honesty is wealth", expand the concept from the perspective of "what is it".

Honesty is the foundation of being a man.

Honesty is the principle of doing things.

Honesty is the only way to learn.

Example 2: Based on the argument that "it is difficult to form a square without regularity", we start thinking from the perspective of "why".

Without rules, individuals can't succeed.

(2) Without rules, the collective cannot be stable.

Without rules, the country cannot develop.

Example 3: Focusing on the argument of "striving to be the leader of the trend of the times", we start thinking from the perspective of "how to do it".

(1) the ideal of challenging the times.

② Excellent knowledge and skills.