Argumentative writing is always discussed from both positive and negative aspects, and both have their established discussion modes, that is, the basic structure of the article is constructed from four parts: "positive discussion of the topic sentence, negative discussion and conclusion" (four-block theory). For example, a topic requires "the school stipulates that students can only stay in their own classrooms during recess, right?" This topic.
If the author thinks that the regulations of the school are wrong, he should make his point in the first paragraph of the article:
At present, there is a lot of discussion about whether students should stay in their classrooms during breaks. Personally, I think ...
And the second one is to discuss the reason why "you can't just stay in your classroom during recess" from the front. For example, you can say:
I think the rest time is our only chance to choose what we want to do. ?
The third part starts from the negative point of view, that is, "you can only stay in your own classroom during recess", refuting the other party's point of view or further expounding your own point of view. For example, you can say:
Another reason why people say that students must stay in their own classrooms during breaks is that it is difficult to organize dinners.
The last article (paragraph) re-emphasized his point of view in different languages. At first glance, the "four-block theory" of argumentative writing seems to be "eight-part essay", but it conforms to the cognitive law of human beings and is worth imitating and practicing more.