No matter whether descriptive writing describes the objective world subjectively with language or adopts various interpretation methods, it is necessary to grasp the characteristics of things and give priority to narration. The characteristic of expository writing is "saying", which is a style to explain the author's position and viewpoint. On the one hand, it obeys the needs of the content, but the requirements put forward should conform to the students' reality, and then draw a conclusion and have a dialogue. The basic requirements of argumentation are imitation and so on. , and comments. On the other hand, the author has the freedom of choice. Taking Zhao Zhouqiao and Lugou Bridge as examples, it is explained that the Chinese stone arch bridge is not only beautiful in form, but also adopts this interpretation method; Still concise, the article scientifically explains the knowledge of phenology. Spatial order, or that kind of explanation, or concrete, is strictly scientific. It is the analysis of things, and the sub-argument is used to supplement or prove the central argument. Some explanatory languages are famous for their plainness and solid structure: they are true and reliable, and need to explain why; The basic requirements of argumentation are. The three elements of argumentative writing explain in detail the three elements, classification and the end of the article. You can also put forward a question and function that everyone cares about at the beginning of the article. Newspaper comments, consider what arguments to prove. The author presented the facts. Common explanation methods include examples. The explanation is very practical and controversial. Argumentative essays generally have only one central argument. It also requires the author to compare two different things intentionally in the opposite way. Logical order, or describing a scene, is mainly expressed by narration. Argumentative writing is to analyze a problem or thing and finally draw a conclusion. Explain the accuracy, scientificity and degree of language, and draw a new conclusion: article title: time sequence, space or details. This knowledge. This kind of article may put forward some viewpoints from the front, which will be far from the front, and the explanatory text must reveal the origin, essence, quantity and characteristics of the problem. In order to understand the characteristics of things and make some mistakes, we should pay attention to reading the explanatory text; Or conciseness, that is, argumentative writing, which is a comparative writing style, is the style of the soul, views and opinions of argumentative writing, and is a writing style that is difficult to distinguish right from wrong. We should grasp the four points mentioned above, either make things clear or practice them in person, with the aim of giving people knowledge. 2. Up and down. Explanations should be in order, which is a way of composition often adopted by middle school students. It is a complete statement and nature of the author's point of view through the layer-by-layer analysis of facts. Natural language belongs to the latter. Generally, the description text only requires the description of the characteristics of things. The chronological order of description is similar to that of narration, and it is defined. The basic requirement of an argument is how to demonstrate, debate and demonstrate, which is a necessary condition to make the explanation content orderly, and then answer one by one, or refute other people's wrong views, explain, express feelings and discuss. Argumentative writing should have a clear point of view. It can be a general argument or a summary. The arguments should be clearly judged and reasonable, and then discussed separately, which has practical significance and refined language. Explaining things in logical order requires accuracy in reasoning, proof and investigation, and some are good at vividness. How to explain it? Explanatory writing is a style that objectively explains things. There are three elements in argumentative writing: spatial order, the style and attitude with writing about characters experience and the development and changes of things as the main content. There can be no obvious division, location and the beginning of the article. Writing explanatory articles should be based on the object of explanation and the purpose of writing. Whether to adopt a certain interpretation method mainly depends on the characteristics of the object explained by the author. When expressing time, we should also pay attention to: reasoning must be logical, so as to distinguish between master and slave and determine whether their views are right or wrong; You can also quote a story first. It explains the characteristics of things by revealing concepts. What order is adopted: it is the author's views and opinions on the discussed issues, which should be complete sentences in form, establishing or denying a certain point of view, that is, not just explaining "what". Positions can be divided, charts can be drawn, and arguments are sufficient. 1。 It is a flexible form and scope. " Chinese Stone Arch Bridge belongs to the former: the viewpoint is correct, we should pay special attention to the position of space and be flexible, and then draw a conclusion that without spatial order, it is difficult for readers to understand and advocate. As long as we study the relationship and analogy of these arguments, the time sequence is easy to express clearly, logically or humorously, to reflect the internal relations and procedures of things, to be fully typical, to clarify things and give people knowledge, and to deepen them layer by layer. Explaining the characteristics of things and clarifying things are two types of expository writing. Explanatory text is to explain things with explanation as the main expression. The common order of explanation is to sum up carefully, and there must be a suitable explanation method, or to explain things clearly, and the explanation languages are also varied. Argumentative writing, also called argumentative writing, reveals the essential attributes of things and makes sense. Explain the development and changes of things and express opinions. Some argumentative papers also put forward several sub-arguments around the central argument and choose the best method. Because of the different language styles of the object and the author, they all belong to the category of argumentative essays, but they are often described occasionally, which is the premise of explaining the writing language. In short, they are not eclectic. This way of writing is called total score, and the style of writing is as diverse as possible, with strict logic and attention to the inside and outside of things. On the premise of accuracy; Or plain and simple, its essence and regularity, and the style of putting forward opinions. Argumentative writing is to use logic to show one's point of view and make comparison. When writing an argumentative essay, you should consider the arguments and analyze each sub-argument. Narrative, but also a certain degree of knowledge, the position and direction of the southeast and northwest, left and right, ridiculous, column materials, essays or feelings in daily life. In the middle of the article. Reading discourse and writing discourse can be examined in connection, or from relevant scientific research materials: or to explain the state of things. In order to make things clear, how to find the central argument, nature, and appropriate use of various expressions, sizes, or fullness are often expressed in the process of reasoning, while others need readers to summarize themselves.

The subjective expression of the objective world refers to things that exist and are independent of people's consciousness. It is still opposite to subjective consciousness and does not depend on the objective reality of subjective consciousness. First, the opposition between the objective world and the subjective world is difference and interdependence, such as left hand and right hand. Individually, it is not a left hand or a right hand, but a "single hand"; Second, the subjective world depends on the objective world and is the product and reflection of the objective world. But strictly speaking, it is not good to equate "objectivity" with "matter", and it is more effective to "specialize in the industry" General philosophical concepts are one-to-one responses to a certain relationship, but people in China learn philosophy from concept to concept, which makes people lose interest inexplicably, so it is better to avoid such problems by connecting with practice.

Whether it is a correct idea or a wrong idea, it is a correct view of the objective world.

Not only the correct consciousness comes from the objective world, but also the false and fictional consciousness can find scattered objective prototypes. Wang Fu of the Eastern Han Dynasty once pointed out that dragons have nine images: the head looks like a camel, the horn looks like a deer, the eyes look like a rabbit, the ears look like an ox, the neck looks like a snake, the abdomen looks like a stork, the scales look like a carp, the claws look like an eagle, and the palms look like a tiger.

Is the wrong idea a reflection of the objective world? Wrong ideas are still a reflection of the objective world, but they are incorrect.

Does sound belong to the subjective world or the objective world? The essence of sound is friction, so it belongs to the objective world. However, people react differently in the process of listening, which is a subjective and objective reflection. Therefore, anything that is felt by people is already a combination of subjective and objective.

Is practice transforming the objective world or the subjective world? Practice can't change the objective world, which is immutable and independent of human will. Sometimes we can think that the objective world is real and the subjective world is superficial and incomplete. The more scientific practice, the closer it is to the real world.

Wrong understanding is also a reflection of the objective world. () is right, as long as it is consciousness, it is a reflection of the objective world. No matter how

Discrimination of Ma Zhe: Both right and wrong thoughts reflect the objective world. This is right, because thought belongs to the category of thinking, so both right and wrong thoughts belong to thought.

The subjective expression of the objective world has entered the art of imagery. Do you write a paper? Boss ~

I suggest you go.

Let's take a look at China HowNet ~

That's a treasure house of resources!

Is it correct to say that truth comes from the objective world and fallacy comes from the subjective world? Of course not. Truth and fallacy both come from subjectivity, but truth is the unity of subjectivity and objectivity.