2. emphasize the central point of ...
Make an appeal or hope that people will.
4. Supplementary argument. Its function is to make the argument more rigorous. )
5. Summarize the full text and get the central argument.
6, ask questions, thought-provoking, make people pay attention to or think about a problem.
The ending is the inevitable result of the development of the full-text content and one of the important components of the article structure.
Extended data:
First, the writing method of argumentative essay:
1, language expression
Language items are an important criterion for composition grading. The language of argumentative writing should be accurate, vivid and vivid. When some students write argumentative essays, they often pose as telling the truth. In order to reason thoroughly, they move out the terms of philosophical principles and dialectics, but the effect is counterproductive.
There are 1000 versions of a truth. Try to choose a vivid version. In order to show vivid effect, besides using analogy, analogy, examples and other argumentation methods, vivid and even gorgeous language is essential. Modify the language of argumentative writing, pay attention to the use of rhetorical devices such as metaphor, parallelism, duality and repetition, and form a beautiful and smooth feeling of the article.
Pay attention to using hypothetical sentences, rhetorical questions or whole sentences to make the article more irrefutable. Although the power of modifying language cannot be achieved overnight, it will naturally improve as long as it is accumulated.
2. Proposed theme
The theme is the eye of the article and an important part of the article to convey important information. Being at the top of the article structure, the title of the article will directly affect the reviewer's first impression of the article.
The basic requirements for the proposed topic of argumentative paper are: to be eye-catching and comfortable on the basis of accuracy. It can be vivid, vivid, concise, unique, neat and so on. In short, it is best to stimulate the reader's interest in reading, or to make him feel refreshed.
The title of an argumentative essay should conform to the stylistic characteristics and be clear, so that people can know its purpose at a glance. Articles with clear views are most popular with commentators, because it has a clear and transparent sense, can convey the general content of the article, and is easy to grasp the basic content of the whole article.
Step 3 argue
Argument is the soul of argumentative writing, sub-argument is the skeleton supporting this soul, and argument is the flesh and blood of argumentative writing. It is inconceivable that a person should be full and colorful, with only a soul and skeleton and no flesh and blood. The same argumentative essay can't be called an article only with central arguments and sub-arguments, and it must also have typical and vivid arguments.
Typical arguments refer to representative examples and famous sayings that can fully reflect the essence of things. First of all, ask for truth and be related to the topic. Secondly, we should abandon the old arguments and use new ones. Some students memorized several classic arguments in their compositions, such as Sima Qian, Madame Curie and Zhang Haidi, and used them from different angles as a kaleidoscope.
In fact, even if these arguments are typical, they are not noticeable. On the contrary, it will be better to choose the new argument that "people have me without me, and people have me", which will make commentators feel fresh when reading.
In addition, some students are used to reasoning with ancient examples, and the whole article fails to connect with reality, has no running water of the times, and cannot achieve the purpose of full reasoning. It is best to quote fashionable sentences and examples that the media generally pay attention to to to assist reasoning, strengthen the pertinence and sense of the times of reasoning, and make the article more convincing.
Second, writing and editing details.
1, foresight:
Stand tall and see far, and don't talk about things. Sometimes it seems nothing, but careful analysis can still find problems. It is far-sighted to find problems among seemingly absent problems.
2, see the micro-knowledge:
In other words, we should see a development trend and a major event from small things.
3. From the outside to the inside:
We should analyze things from the surface to the essence.
4. From here to there:
Sometimes two things seem completely unrelated. In fact, they have certain internal relations. You should be able to connect them.
Baidu encyclopedia-argumentative paper