1, the writing of the paper must highlight the key points. There is an article about dexterous hands of robots. The project itself is well done, but this article covers the structure of dexterous hand, finger drive and grasping control, and all parts are not thorough and have no depth. It would be much better if this article could focus on the driving of dexterous hands with limited size. There is also an article about tele-technology, which first talks about the structure of micro-camera, and then extracts the basic concepts of fuzzy control from some books. There is no organic connection between them, so this article has no content at all. If we focus on the problem solved by miniaturization of visual system, I am afraid we can write something.

2. The content of the paper should be true and correct. This is very important. Not cheating is a good scientific morality. If people see the fake, this article will definitely not be used. There is an article about control algorithm, which is a simulation algorithm. The joint angle function used in the simulation is q=0. 1sin(3πt), and the period is obviously (2/3)s, but the period of the simulation curve is 2.8s, and the maximum angular velocity is much smaller. This result at least makes people suspect that the author has not really made a simulation.

3. About a comprehensive article. The content of the summary article is mainly about what research predecessors have done on a particular topic, what problems have been solved, and what problems need further study. The most important thing is to point out the direction of further research on this subject. In this sense, writing a comprehensive article is actually very difficult and requires a lot of information. Moreover, it is necessary to analyze information, discard the rough and retain the essence, discard the false and retain the true, and build a strategic position. Never write a summary after reading a few published papers.

4. About the formula in the paper. Formulas are generally indispensable in scientific papers. It is important to deduce the formula correctly, but it is not necessary to write down the step-by-step derivation process clearly. Although some articles have written formulas, such formulas are useless if we do not pay attention to the interpretation of symbols used in the formulas and the applicable conditions of the formulas. There is an article about a parallel mechanism with three artificial muscles as actuators. The author tries to establish its mathematical model. The relationship between input air pressure and muscle length of artificial muscle is written in front, and the force balance equation is listed. Then it is said that a nonlinear state equation is obtained by combining the former with the latter as a mathematical model. There are many coefficients in the equation, which are obviously related to the mechanism and muscle parameters. The author just didn't write the relationship between coefficients and parameters, which makes people wonder whether this model is derived. Even so, such a model is just a general formula and useless.