In the eyes of many people, Jing Ke is a hero with great courage and sense of justice. But in the eyes of historians, Jing Ke is not that simple. Literary historians and historians have different views on this character. Han said: "Jing Ke is a brave warrior with high martial arts and chivalry. His righteous act of stabbing Qin stems from his hatred for the national enemy, and it is also his last fight for his right to live. He has nothing to do with Yan. If Yan Taizi Dan wants to assassinate Ying Zheng, there is a personal grudge, then Jing Ke's purpose is to save the people of the six countries. " Zhang used the word "anti-violence" to interpret Jing Ke's behavior. "Taizi Dan didn't reuse Jing Ke at first, and later even let him stab Qin to death, and he didn't fully understand and trust him," Han explained. "So, Jing Ke doesn't want to die for his bosom friend. The value of his behavior lies not in his personal loyalty, but in the fact that he represents the people's anti-violence heart. " For the narrow concept of the country at that time, he was a chivalrous man, but for the present situation of reunification, he was just an assassin who tried to obstruct reunification and rashly attacked with manly courage. An assassin, an assassin. He's an assassin. In the past, it was said that "chivalrous men use force to violate the ban", and chivalrous men are people who undermine the current system. Today's saying is that "the great chivalrous man is for the country and the people", and the chivalrous man is a righteous act of robbing the rich and helping the poor and drawing a sword to help each other.

Jing Ke stabbed Qin because yan dan had an intersection with his own knot, not for the six countries and their people. What he said when he died was just a lie to cover up his mistake. Didn't Sima Qian attribute him to an assassin? What are the similarities between him and Guo Jie of Zhujiajian Island and Jin Yong's chivalrous man? I think it's hard to tell the difference between a knight and an assassin.

Just like Yue Fei.

Jing Ke stabbed Qin because yan dan had an intersection with his own knot, not for the six countries and their people. What he said when he died was just a lie to cover up his mistake. Didn't Sima Qian attribute him to an assassin? What are the similarities between him and Guo Jie of Zhujiajian Island and Jin Yong's chivalrous man? An assassin who rashly attacked only by a man's courage. Just an assassin!

By reporting Taizi Dan's personal experience, he took risks, went against the trend of China's reunification, and regarded the courage of a man as a car, which was a typical personal heroism. Pathetic! !

His assassination was neither aboveboard nor chivalrous.

Later generations wrote in mourning: There was no murder in Du Kang, but there was blood over Xianyang Temple. It's embarrassing. Assassin! ! ! The clown, because he was adopted in the loss, had to repay his kindness with his life. It's not easy. To Zi Ying, he was a chivalrous man, and to the king of Qin, he was an assassin. In other words, Qin Shi was a chivalrous man before, but he became an assassin after Qin Shi.

Look at the problem from a developmental perspective! ! ! ! ! ! ! & lt/SPAN>。 & lt/p & gt；